Browse
Search
Meeting 012596
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Stoney Creek Work Group
>
Meeting 012596
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:54:15 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 11:36:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lee: Thinks people focus on percentages and try to translate into <br />total density they can have. Has no effect on number of units you <br />can have and therefore no effect on density. <br />Curtis: Why do you use 1.75 acres for a one -acre designated rural <br />development when you have 33% non - buildable land? <br />Lee: The way this works is that you look at land you have and <br />figure out how many units that land can support based on its <br />percability. For example, you've got 400 acres that peres at two <br />acres per unit, then that gives you 200 units. The only thing this <br />(yield plan ?) determines is how densely packed those 200 units are <br />going to be. <br />Curtis: Not taking into account buffer zones. <br />Lee: Has no effect on total number of units; does affect placement <br />of those units-. <br />Curtis: Fear that government may interpret this wrong. <br />Elio: Restating what has been said to be sure he understands. <br />Assume that under present zoning you have determined how many units <br />you can build. You can still build that number of units because we <br />are not changing the zoning. However, if you allow at least 50% of <br />the land to be open space, then you can build those units clustered <br />on another part of the land and if you will allow 60% of the land <br />to be open we allow you to build even more units. <br />Curtis: Don't think this (quarter -acre lots with access to common <br />open space) represents rural character. <br />Lee: The design principle when doing cluster development is to <br />attempt to get as many units as you possibly can, to try and design <br />the site so that all units have direct access (to open space). <br />Curtis: "But you still aren't saying, this is mine." <br />Elio: Let's leave this aside, is an emotional issue. The <br />possibility is that you are going to build the same number of units <br />but in a different way. In addition, if you are willing to go to <br />60% on open space you may get 210 units rather than 200. Maybe <br />going with this approach will allow you to speed up the process so <br />you can build without delay. Maybe the entrance is the only place <br />you need a standard road and interior roads can be private. The <br />open land preserved will allow for more wildlife, more open space, <br />and nice views. But person may say, this takes away from the <br />property owner. The question becomes, will a developer /property <br />owner find a market receptive to this new idea? This appears to be <br />happening in some areas. Some people are willing to buy into an <br />environment that is preserved more naturally, although they have to <br />share it with other people. Is a different way to look at <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.