Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-17-1995 - XI-1 Stoney Creek Appts
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 10-17-95
>
Agenda - 10-17-1995 - XI-1 Stoney Creek Appts
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 4:44:34 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 4:44:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/17/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
XI-1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ai <br />a new neighborhood representative. <br />David Yelton asked if they could be incorporated under large land <br />holders. <br />Verla Insko said she thought large land owners was being confused <br />with at -large representatives, a mix up of terms. She said the <br />question was would they be appointed as at- large, or as <br />representatives of their neighborhood. <br />David Yelton indicated he thought the decision should be left up to <br />the Commissioners. <br />Bob Strayhorn said he thought he had made a motion that was clear <br />and he thought he heard the County Manager say he understood the <br />group's intent and that he would deliver it to the Commissioners. <br />He said he was satisfied with that and felt that it would get the <br />group back on the agenda and satisfy the Bumphus family too. <br />James Bumphus said that was correct. <br />Verla Insko said she thought the group had consensus and the <br />Commissioners could decide the question of neighborhood or at -large <br />representation. <br />John Link said if Insko could summarize the three points mentioned <br />earlier, without raising the question about type of appointment, he <br />thought it would be pretty easy to carry to the Commissioners. <br />Verla Insko summarized as follows: 1) We have a defined <br />neighborhood that has not been represented on this group; 2) there <br />has been a member of this neighborhood who has been a fairly <br />consistent. attendee;. and 3) the planning group requests that an <br />appointment from that neighborhood be made. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.