Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-14-2005-3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 04-14-2005
>
Agenda - 04-14-2005-3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:30:37 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:15:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/14/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20050414
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~, <br />Orange County/Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools Study: <br />Description and Analysis of Educational Resources <br />Executive Summary <br />In response to a request from the Oronge County Commissioners, a research team <br />from the School of Education at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill conducted a <br />study to assess the educational resources available to students in the Orange County <br />Schools (OCS) and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS), We reviewed North <br />Carolina Report Card Data and data provided on request from the school districts. We also <br />visited and interviewed every school principal in both districts.. We met with the <br />Educntional Excellence Work Group, comprised of the two school superintendents, County <br />Commissioners, County Manager and Assistant Manager, and a representative from the <br />Public School Forum for guidance and direction and to check the accuracy of our findings. <br />Resources <br />These are two excellent school districts, working with energy, dedication, and <br />careful judgment to educate diverse student bodies.. The local school tax in Chapel Hill and <br />Carrboro generates over 12 million dollars a year for CHCCS schools that is not available to <br />OCS schools. Although the salary supplement for the most experienced teachers in CHCCS <br />is higher than in OCS, salories below that stage are generally commensurate, and each <br />district is staffed with accomplished and well-credentialed teachers. The local funds <br />available to CHCCS support, however, a number of specialists to provide instruction and <br />support to students. Their presence permits greater attention to individual students as <br />well as alleviating some of the strain made by multiple demands on the time and attention of <br />the general classroom teachers and school administrotors. <br />Both districts mirror the national emphasis on early education and elementary school <br />literacy, investing extensive district resources in reading specialists in the elementary <br />schools. At the elementary level CHCCS hove more assistants in classrooms and literacy <br />specialists available to work with students. OCS have hired three extra teachers for <br />grades 3-5 and have been able to keep class size smaller on average by three students than <br />3-5 classes in CHCCS. Given the larger proportion of economically disadvantaged children in <br />OCS, it is significant that the literacy achievement, as measured by End of Grade (EOG) <br />proficiency test performance among the elementory school children of both districts, is <br />almost comparable. This parity in achievement at the elementary school level raises the <br />question of what further resources are necessary to support the learning of OC.S students <br />as they make the transitions from elementary school to middle school and high school. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.