Browse
Search
BOA agenda 050718
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
BOA agenda 050718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2018 3:54:04 PM
Creation date
6/25/2018 3:52:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/7/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT 4/16/18 MINUTES <br />10 <br /> 360 <br />MOTION made by Susan Halkiotis that the building will maintain or promote public health, safety and 361 <br />general welfare. Randy Herman seconded. 362 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 363 <br /> 364 <br />Samantha Cabe: With regard to Finding 2, we must find that either the use will or will not maintain or 365 <br />enhance the value of contiguous property. Do I have a motion that based on the application submitted, that 366 <br />the proposed use will maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property? 367 <br /> 368 <br /> 369 Randy Herman: Can I make a comment on this? 370 <br /> 371 <br />Samantha Cabe: You may. 372 <br /> 373 <br />Randy Herman: The letter that was in there from the commercial realtor, it seemed to be a summary and 374 <br />not supported. But I think the application was sufficient and there was not testimony against the idea that it 375 <br />will maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property. 376 <br /> 377 <br />MOTION made by Randy Herman that the use will enhance or maintain the value of contiguous property. 378 <br />Holly Safi seconded. 379 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 380 <br /> 381 <br />Samantha Cabe: Finally, the last finding. This board must determine that the location and the charcter of 382 <br />the use, if developed according to the plan submitted, will or will not be in harmony with the area in which it 383 <br />is to be located and the use is in compliance with the plan for the physical development of the County as 384 <br />embodied in these regulations. Do I have a motion that the location and character of the use, if developed 385 <br />according to the plan submitted, will be in harmony with the area? 386 <br /> 387
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.