Browse
Search
BOH agenda 052318
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
BOH agenda 052318
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2018 2:52:42 PM
Creation date
6/25/2018 2:51:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
BOH minutes 052318
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Board of Health\Minutes\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2018 Public Health Dashboards May 13, 2018 <br />Executive Summary <br />4 | Page <br /> <br /> <br />As of February 2018, North Carolina has enrolled 2,055,472 individuals in Medicaid and CHIP — a net increase of 29% since <br />the first Marketplace Open Enrollment Period and related Medicaid program changes in October 2013. However, NC falls five <br />percentage points (5%) behind the US, and Orange County falls seven percentage points (7%) behind. In numbers, this <br />represents a difference of nearly 187,000 low‐income individuals in NC and more than 10,000 low‐income individuals in <br />Orange County that would be covered if the county’s uninsured rates matched those of the United States. <br />In terms of resources, Orange County leads the state in physician density, and the supply of physicians grew from 2013 to <br />2016. In 2013 and 2014, Orange County ranked first in dentist density. Although there was a large decrease in the number <br />of dentists in 2013, this trend reversed in 2014, with the dentist rate increasing by more than 6 dentists per 10,000 people. <br />Trends in 2016 continue to show growth in both physician and dentist density. <br />Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) <br />The incidence of most STIs increased in 2016 for Orange County. Gonorrhea, Chlamydia and HIV Infection Rates in particular <br />are higher for Orange County than our peers, and increasing at a significant rate. From 2012‐2016, Chlamydia increased at a <br />faster rate than North Carolina (~13 case increase a year per 100,000 for NC vs ~ 35 case increase a year per 100,000 for <br />Orange County. Disaggregated data from 2015 by township has shown that these higher rates of STIs are affecting both urban <br />and rural areas of the county. <br />Injury and Violence <br />Alcohol related vehicle indicators showed improvement from 2015 to 2016, which was identified as an area of concern on <br />previous dashboards. Both alcohol related crash rates and reported drinking and driving behaviors among youth saw a <br />decrease. However, texting and driving is rising among youth (21% in 2017, compared to 17% in 2015). 2016 also saw an <br />increase in several indicators related to violent crime. In particular, the indicator for rape crimes increased from 15 per <br />100,000 to 21 per 100,000. While sexual assault crimes are often under reported, national media trends have increasingly <br />reported on a movement to hold public figures responsible for these crimes and may account for some of this increase in <br />reporting at the local level. In any case, this is an indicator to be aware of for Orange County as it is on the rise and greater <br />than or peers. Drug overdose is an additional area of concern, examined in greater depth as a part of the Substance Use and <br />Mental Health dashboard and summary. <br />Maternal and Infant Health <br /> Orange County performs well on most indicators of Maternal and Infant Health, however many disparities exist for these <br />indicators by race and ethnicity. In 2016, Orange County also saw an increase in the teen pregnancy rate and % of teen <br />pregnancies that are repeat. 1 in 4 teen pregnancies in 2016 was a repeat teen pregnancy. With small numbers, it is <br />important to remember that fluctuations in indicators such as these is expected from year to year. Non‐Hispanic Black <br />Babies in particular are at high risk for either a low or very low birth weight as compared to other race and ethnicity groups. <br />Approximately 13% Non‐Hispanic black children are born low birth weight as compared to 6% Non‐Hispanic White children. <br />Similarly 3.2% Black children have a very low birth weight, whereas only 1.2% Non‐Hispanic White births are very low birth <br />weight. Therefore, Non‐Hispanic Black babies are more than two times as likely to be born with a low or very low birth <br />weight as compared to their Non‐Hispanic White peers.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.