Orange County NC Website
9 <br /> <br />Commissioner Rich said the aqua resolution, at the Commissioners’ places, came out of <br />agenda review and is about Net Neutrality. She said this will be on the agenda for the June 19th <br />meeting, and asked if any comments could be forwarded to her. <br />Commissioner Rich said last Friday was National Gun Violence Awareness day, and the <br />light blue petition at the Commissioners’ places refers to this. She said Chapel Hill, Carrboro, <br />and Orange County are part of this petition, which the Chair will sign. She petitioned for the <br />Town of Hillsborough to be asked to join next year. <br />Commissioner Burroughs had no comments. <br />Commissioner McKee said given the action of the Legislature on the light rail funding, <br />he asked if the Chair would request a response from Go Triangle by June 19th on how this <br />legislative action affects the plan; the purchase of the maintenance facility property; and <br />whether there is a plan B going forward. He said would also like to request a monthly financial <br />report from Go Triangle <br />Commissioner McKee said, about a year ago, there was petition about district elections <br />and making them more equitable. He said he is issuing this petition that by one of the fall <br />agendas, that staff bring forward the process by which the County could move to district- <br />nominate, district-elect. <br />Chair Dorosin referred to, and read, the statement below: <br /> <br />Statement from Orange County Board of Commissioners concerning the North Carolina <br />state budget language that could eliminate state and federal funding for the Durham- <br />Orange Light Rail project. <br />The Durham-Orange Light Rail Project was endorsed by county voters in 2011 and 2012. <br />In April of 2017, the County Commissioners of Durham and Orange County, along with Go <br />Triangle, agreed to a cost-share agreement that allowed the project to move forward to the <br />design and engineering phase. Along the way, it twice received high scores from the NCDOT <br />as well as the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Currently about half of the design and <br />engineering work has been done and the project is on schedule to qualify for and receive a <br />50% share of project costs from the federal government. <br /> <br />We are disappointed that, after clearing multiple hurdles in an understandable, data- <br />driven, non-political process, the North Carolina State Legislature has included language in its <br />current budget that would prevent the project from meeting federal guidelines, effectively <br />terminating the project. The language provides that state funding would not be released until all <br />other funding sources, including federal, have been secured. The FTA requires that all other <br />funding sources be secured before it releases funds. <br /> <br />If the intent of the legislation is to ensure that no state funds are spent before the federal <br />funds are granted, which is a reasonable requirement on behalf of the taxpayers of our state, a <br />revision to the wording of the budget in a technical corrections bill can clarify that matter and <br />allow the project to proceed. <br /> <br />The cost-share agreement provides that if either the state or federal funding is not <br />forthcoming, the parties to the agreement must meet and confer to modify the agreement. <br /> <br />The Orange County Commissioners pledged at the beginning of this process that we <br />would not spend more than the $149.5 million that we committed in the cost-share agreement. <br />As we consider the prospect of having to rework the cost-share agreement, we want to <br />reassure the residents of Orange County that we remain committed to this spending limitation. <br />