Orange County NC Website
<br /> <br />consideration of stakeholder concerns, before bringing an item to the <br />Board of County Commissioners. <br /> <br />The ASAB would stress that it is fundamentally concerned not only about <br />animal welfare but about the human aspects of animal issues and services. <br />Indeed, one board member is the Health Board veterinarian for Orange <br />County. In addition, the ASAB values and seeks to support the “human- <br />animal bond” and the role of animal companions in enriching the quality of <br />life for individuals, communities and cultures. <br /> <br />Of special concern are the services needed by disadvantaged and often <br />underserved households. A good illustration is the ASAB’s support for <br />Animal Services partnership with the Department of Social Service to <br />provide affordable pet sterilization to households of lesser means. A more <br />recent initiative is support for efforts to create partnerships with the Family <br />Success Alliance and also the Roger’s Road Neighborhood Association <br />and Rogers Eubank Neighborhood Association (RENA). <br /> <br />What are your Board/Commission’s most important accomplishments? <br /> <br />The ASAB continued to work with staff and stakeholders to support and <br />promote a strategic plan for managing pet overpopulation in Orange <br />County. The board was integral to developing a five year plan to address <br />free-roaming cats as a critical component of pet overpopulation in Orange <br />County (see Appendix I). <br /> <br />The ASAB continued to conduct appeal hearings for potentially dangerous <br />dog declarations made under North Carolina’s general statutes. The <br />opportunity for an appeal is mandated and also an important check and <br />balance for county Animal Services. To date In 2015, So far in 2015 XY <br />eleven (11) potentially dangerous dog declarations have been appealed and <br />several of these are currently under further appeal in Superior Court. <br /> <br />The ASAB considered whether Animal Services should participate in <br />research oriented toward helping shelter animals. Ultimately, the ASAB <br />decided against recommending that Animal Services participate in such <br />research because of the risks involved in doing so on the basis of the work <br />of a subcommittee that was formed to consider this complex and <br />challenging issue. The subcommittee reported out on the pros and cons of <br />Animal Services participating in such research on two different occassions <br />before the ASAB made its final decision. The ASAB considered thie issue <br />of animal research at the request of staff They did so at the request of staff <br />which, absent known and accepted guidelines and protocols, has which <br />had declined to participate in such research because of the absence of <br />known and accepted guidelines and protocols. . (Most recently staff <br />regrettably declined a request made by a faculty member at the NCSU