Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-15-2005-5k
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 03-15-2005
>
Agenda - 03-15-2005-5k
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 6:31:02 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:11:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/15/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5k
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20050315
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ISSUES AND QUESTIONS <br />Possible issues that Task Force members should discuss might include the following: <br />• Multi-jurisdictional program possibly involving Chapel Hill, Carrbora, Mebane, and/or <br />Hillsborough. <br />• Is the public purchase of a conservation easement equivalent to the public purchase of a <br />property's development rights? <br />• Multiple owners in a single sending zone? <br />• Density means the number of development rights originating from an individual parcel. <br />• When a development right is used, how shall it be extinguished? <br />• Development rights certificates cannot be transferred into another area defined as a <br />sending zone, <br />• The nature of the easement placed on the sending zone parcel after transfer should <br />allow staff to resolve any zoning ordinance violation (i,e., derelict structures, junk and <br />debris, multiple residential structures, and the like) before recording the easement, <br />• Equity of price of densities purchased weighted against the value of the densities <br />transferred, <br />• Design guidelines for the receiving zone should be established. <br />• Establishment of a planning management procedure to transfer and to develop property <br />rights. <br />• TDR certificates, <br />• Is down zoning needed, and if so, where? <br />• Will rezoning be required or can this be accomplished administratively? <br />• Will the sending and receiving zones need to be down zoned or can it be accomplished <br />with the present situation? <br />• Is there an economic market with sufficient vitality to sustain a Transfer Program? <br />• How do we compare the Orange County real estate marketplace to other communities <br />with successful programs? <br />• What incentives must Orange County provide to initiate a TDR program? <br />• Are all TDR densities (development rights) equal in value? <br />• Conversion of residential development rights to commercial development rights, <br />• TDR information clearinghouse -who has them and who wants them, linking the two <br />interests. <br />• Where will the land bank reside or where is the rights pool? <br />• How should the public, real estate and development interests be made aware of the TDR <br />program? <br />• The acquisition of additional computer software to aid in the public discussion of the TDR <br />application in Orange County. <br />• Consistency and coordination with the County's Lands Legacy Program <br />• Provide equity to property owners to compensate them for releasing their development <br />rights, <br />• Explore the possibility of enlarging the market for receiving zones to areas outside of <br />Orange County <br />GEOGRAPHIC EXTENT <br />The geographic extent for the TDR study includes all un-incorporated areas of the County, but <br />could include one or more of the four towns and their extra territorial zoning jurisdictions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.