Browse
Search
Minutes 05-15-2018
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Minutes 05-15-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 2:55:06 PM
Creation date
6/6/2018 8:21:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/15/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Agenda Item
6/5/18; 8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Board Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 05-15-2018 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment - Flags and Flagpoles
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 05-15-2018 8-a - Minutes
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 05-15-2018 8-b - Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budget Amendment #9
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 05-15-2018 8-c - Family Success Alliance – Agreements for Navigator Program
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 05-15-2018 8-d - Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Amendment Outline and Schedule –UDO Text Amendments Clarifying Impervious Surface Regulations
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 05-15-2018 8-e - Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance – Approval and Certification of 2018 Report
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda - 05-15-2018 8-f - Change in BOCC Regular Meeting Schedule for 2018
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda- 05-15-2018 11-a - Advisory Board on Aging - Appointments
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda- 05-15-2018 11-b - Board of Health - Appointments
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Meeting
Agenda- 05-15-2018 12-1 - Information Item - May 1, 2018 BOCC Meeting Follow-up Actions List
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 05-15-2018 Regular Meeting
ORD-2018-017 Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment - Flags and Flagpoles
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2018
ORD-2018-018 Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budget Amendment #9
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br /> <br />Michael Harvey said at some at some point anyone with a non-compliant flag will have <br />to bring it into compliance, regardless of who that person/business/school, etc. is. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos asked if consistent height is part of this. <br />John Roberts said yes, and this is recommended in attachment 7. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said he would be in favor of a future UDO conversation about <br />exempting the schools, fire departments, and other government agencies in that realm. <br />Commissioner Price asked if the Towns have similar ordinances on the flags, and, if not, <br />will the County ask the Towns to create such an ordinance, since many schools are within Town <br />limits. <br />Michael Harvey said Towns can choose to regulate this issue or not, consistent with <br />their enabling authority. He said there are communities within Orange County that have <br />standards governing the erection of flags. He said this ordinance is modeled on certain <br />provisions from Durham, in terms of size and height limits. <br />Michael Harvey said Chapel Hill and Hillsborough exempt the American flag and the <br />State flag, and both have some requirements. He said Orange County adopting an ordinance <br />does not require a town to do the same. He said the only issue the Towns have to assess is <br />whether any ordinance the Towns have is content neutral, which is between the Town officials, <br />its Planning Board and Attorneys. <br />Commissioner Price said many people who spoke tonight live within the Towns, and she <br />would hope that there would be similar ordinances throughout the County at some point. <br />Michael Harvey said Orange County issues are unique, and may not be experienced by <br />the Towns and vice versa. <br />Commissioner Price asked if this will impact schools that are located within the <br />municipalities. <br />Michael Harvey said those schools would have to abide by any applicable municipal <br />ordinance. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if it is clear in the ordinance that the Board is talking about <br />a maximum height. <br />Michael Harvey said yes, and the maximum height would be 24 feet in a residential <br />district, and 54 feet in a non-residential district. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said the pole can be up to 24 feet, but not limited to 24 feet. <br />Michael Harvey said it can be no higher than 24 feet, and this specific language can be <br />found on page 19, point #2. <br />Commissioner McKee said he understood Commissioner Marcoplos’ concern about the <br />impact on the County, schools and fire departments, but he would strongly oppose exempting <br />the County from regulations it is putting on everyone else. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Burroughs, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs <br />for the Board to adopt the proposed amendments by approving the Statement of Consistency, <br />as contained in Attachment 3. <br /> <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Marcoplos, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to <br />adopt the County’s Attorney’s May 10, 2018 Proposed UDO Text Amendments as contained in <br />Attachment 7. <br /> <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.