Orange County NC Website
17 <br /> <br />Michael Harvey said at some at some point anyone with a non-compliant flag will have <br />to bring it into compliance, regardless of who that person/business/school, etc. is. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos asked if consistent height is part of this. <br />John Roberts said yes, and this is recommended in attachment 7. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said he would be in favor of a future UDO conversation about <br />exempting the schools, fire departments, and other government agencies in that realm. <br />Commissioner Price asked if the Towns have similar ordinances on the flags, and, if not, <br />will the County ask the Towns to create such an ordinance, since many schools are within Town <br />limits. <br />Michael Harvey said Towns can choose to regulate this issue or not, consistent with <br />their enabling authority. He said there are communities within Orange County that have <br />standards governing the erection of flags. He said this ordinance is modeled on certain <br />provisions from Durham, in terms of size and height limits. <br />Michael Harvey said Chapel Hill and Hillsborough exempt the American flag and the <br />State flag, and both have some requirements. He said Orange County adopting an ordinance <br />does not require a town to do the same. He said the only issue the Towns have to assess is <br />whether any ordinance the Towns have is content neutral, which is between the Town officials, <br />its Planning Board and Attorneys. <br />Commissioner Price said many people who spoke tonight live within the Towns, and she <br />would hope that there would be similar ordinances throughout the County at some point. <br />Michael Harvey said Orange County issues are unique, and may not be experienced by <br />the Towns and vice versa. <br />Commissioner Price asked if this will impact schools that are located within the <br />municipalities. <br />Michael Harvey said those schools would have to abide by any applicable municipal <br />ordinance. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked if it is clear in the ordinance that the Board is talking about <br />a maximum height. <br />Michael Harvey said yes, and the maximum height would be 24 feet in a residential <br />district, and 54 feet in a non-residential district. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said the pole can be up to 24 feet, but not limited to 24 feet. <br />Michael Harvey said it can be no higher than 24 feet, and this specific language can be <br />found on page 19, point #2. <br />Commissioner McKee said he understood Commissioner Marcoplos’ concern about the <br />impact on the County, schools and fire departments, but he would strongly oppose exempting <br />the County from regulations it is putting on everyone else. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Burroughs, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs <br />for the Board to adopt the proposed amendments by approving the Statement of Consistency, <br />as contained in Attachment 3. <br /> <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Marcoplos, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to <br />adopt the County’s Attorney’s May 10, 2018 Proposed UDO Text Amendments as contained in <br />Attachment 7. <br /> <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />