Orange County NC Website
13 <br /> <br />Center designated hate group, and its sole purpose is to perpetuate the lost cause mythology of <br />neo-confederate culture, and intimidate people of color. He said these massive flags do just <br />that. <br />Katherine Walker said she was born and bred in Orange County, and her roots run <br />deep. She said she and her family are Americans, and she fully supports the adoption of the <br />ordinance text amendment. She said it clarifies rules, is content neutral, and there is no rational <br />reason for delay. She said the Confederate movement has been a growing threat to the <br />American way of life, and the battle flag was not popular at the end of the civil war, but has <br />become a symbol to encourage violence and oppression after the release of the film The Birth <br />of a Nation. She said this is not a fight for heritage, but a fight for human decency. <br />Chuck W illingham said he is a resident of Orange County, and a member of the Hate <br />Free Schools coalition. He said the proposed text amendment is content neutral, and balances <br />free speech and property rights of neighbors. He said the argument of southern pride and <br />freedom of speech ignores race. He said the Confederate flag is used as a hate symbol by <br />white supremacists, and the Confederate leaders supported slavery. He said the harm of <br />slavery continues to affect all aspects of life for African Americans, and people of color. He <br />said America will not be great until race is no longer a predictor of outcomes. He thanked the <br />Board for updating the Unified Development Ordinance. <br />Kathy Arab said the County does not need uniformity of flags, and diversity and <br />individualism are hallmarks of this nation and County. She said erasing history, tearing down <br />statues, and removing flags will not help to avoid the mistakes of the past. She said she would <br />never display a Confederate flag, and much of southern history is shameful, but society has <br />overcome the sins of the past, yet is not receiving credit for it. She said modern day white <br />supremacists are in the minority, and it is completely unfair to law abiding, fair minded citizens <br />to be punished because of a few white supremacists. She said personal property is indeed <br />protected by the constitution, as is freedom of expression. She said flags are decorative, and <br />the government has no business poking around or photographing decorations in one’s home, or <br />on one’s property. She said flags are an expression of free speech, and personal style is not to <br />be restricted unless one lives in a neighborhood with guidelines created by the residents of said <br />neighborhood, to which all residents have agreed to abide through conversation and <br />consensus. She said when they purchased their home over twenty years ago, the home came <br />with a two-story flagpole cemented into the ground. She does not want to have to remove this, <br />and the only flag she has ever flown from it is the stars and stripes. She said she does not see <br />why the Commissioners care about regulating the height of her flagpole should an act of nature <br />knock it down, and it need replacing. She said it sounds like the only reason the <br />Commissioners are acting is because someone could not handle what someone else was doing <br />on their own private property. She said she may not like it either, but it is not her property. She <br />said the Commissioners have more important things to be working on than this issue. She <br />recommended a fourth option be added to the recommendation: table this tedious, <br />cumbersome, ridiculous, and unnecessary proposal. She said this proposed amendment is a <br />slippery slope, which will chip away at the constitution. She said if free speech is not unlimited, <br />then the stars and stripes should not be allowed to be burned, which it is frequently. She said <br />government overreach is more harmful than a painted piece of fabric hanging around. <br />David Carpenter said laws in general are usually blunt instruments, and are crafted in <br />response to specific situations, and represent an attempt to resolve a problem or provide for <br />particular needs. He said even in best case scenarios laws do not always work in the ways they <br />were intended. He said the regulations being considered today are an attempt to address the <br />problem of some people’s responses to seeing a Confederate flag. He said this is not an <br />attempt to address a widespread existing problem with giant flags flying from towering flagpoles <br />right at the borders of people’s property. He said this is an attempt to address the problem in a