Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-01-2005-9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 03-01-2005
>
Agenda - 03-01-2005-9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 1:58:45 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:08:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/1/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
2005 S Planning - Consultant Services for Development of a Countywide Transfer of Development Rights
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
firms, Five firms subsequently submitted proposals, Each firm was independently rated on the <br />following criteria by the evaluation team: <br />1, Project interest and understanding, <br />2, The firm's history and experience with similar projects, <br />3. The firm's ability and expertise, <br />4. The abilities of key personnel assigned to the project, <br />5. Knowledge of local planning constraints and real estate economics, and <br />6, Technical and analytic abilities. <br />Cost figures were not a part of the evaluation process. Results were tabulated and the top <br />three firms were invited for interviews, Those firms were Clarion and Associates, the Freilich, <br />Leitner and Carlisle group, and the Louis Berger/UNC-Charlotte Urban Institute group, <br />References were also contacted for all three firms. After the interview process, two firms -- the <br />Freilich, Leitner & Carlisle group and the Louis Berger/UNC-Charlotte Urban Institute group -- <br />were identified as being capable of meeting the County s needs. Each firm was asked to <br />provide costs associated with the three phases, The work group then voted to recommend the <br />team of UNCC and The Berger Group to conduct phases one and two, <br />During its review, the work group invited written proposals from the three semi-finalist firms. <br />After opting to further negotiate with the two finalists, specific questions were posed to each. A <br />copy of the Louis Berger /University of North Carolina -Charlotte Urban Institute group's work <br />plan (scope of services) is attached (Appendix I). <br />A timeline of key events during this evaluation process include the following dates for the events <br />previously described: <br />• June 23 - BOCC authorizes staff to issue the RFQ to professional planning consultants <br />for the development of a countywide TDR program. <br />• July 6 -Orange County TDR RFO posted on APA and North Carolina Chapter of APA <br />websites, <br />• .luly 19 -Deadline for respondent questions. <br />August 2 -Orange County field totar for interested firms. <br />• August 13 -Deadline for RFQ responses. Five were received, including: <br />o Robert J. Goldstein <br />o Freilich, Leitner, & Carlisle/.lames Nicholas/Jordan, .Jones & Golding <br />o Louis Berger/University of North Carolina at Charlotte -Urban Institute <br />o Clarion & Associates <br />o The American Farmland Trust <br />• August --Work group met to evaluate responses. Three (Freilich, Louis Berger, and <br />Clarion) are invited to interviews. <br />• September 8 to 13 -Interviews at the Governmental Service Center. <br />• October 13 -Finalists (Freilich, Leitner & Carlisle group and Louis Berger /University of <br />North Carolina -Charlotte Urban Institute) are selected and additional questions are sent <br />to each. <br />• November 1 -All answers are evaluated. <br />In conclusion, the work group recommends to the BOCC that the County enter into negotiations <br />with the Louis Berger /University of North Carolina at Charlotte -Urban Institute group to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.