Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-01-2005-8b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 03-01-2005
>
Agenda - 03-01-2005-8b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 1:59:45 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:08:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/1/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8b
Document Relationships
RES-2005-014 Orange County's 2005 Legislative Agenda
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2005
RES-2005-015 Orange County's 2005 Legislative Agenda
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2005
RES-2005-016 Orange County's 2005 Legislative Agenda
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br />operational, and other needs associated with ever- <br />increasing judicial activities; <br />51)* Express support for the adoption of the federal <br />Uniform Real Property Electronic Recordation Act (UPERA) <br />to streamline the recording and cancellation processes, <br />to address the Notary Certification issue, and to reduce <br />the liability of Registers of Deeds; <br />52)Support legislation that, in the event county <br />regulation/inspection of body piercing establishments is <br />state-mandated, adequate state funding is included to <br />address the additional county cost, or, as an <br />alternative, counties are allowed to collect fees to <br />offset the cost of the regulation/inspection activities; <br />53)* Support amending previous legislation regarding a <br />national criminal record check for long-term care <br />employees (all persons involved in direct patient care) <br />to address conflicts related to federal privacy rules <br />(Senate Bill 41 and House Bill 176); <br />54)Support statutory clarification on the definition of <br />special care locked units (units intended to meet <br />certain requirements in order to provide special care <br />for persons with Alzheimer's disease or related <br />disorders; not simply units with a door that locks). <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.