Orange County NC Website
DRAFT <br />MINUTES 1 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 2 MAY 2, 2018 3 <br />REGULAR MEETING 4 5 <br /> 6 MEMBERS PRESENT: Randy Marshall (Vice-Chair), Bingham Township Representative; Kim Piracci, At-Large; Randy 7 <br />Marshall, At-Large; David Blankfard, Hillsborough Township Representative; Laura Nicholson, Eno Township 8 <br />Representative; Alexander Gregory, Chapel Hill Township Representative; David Blankfard, Hillsborough Township 9 <br />Representative; Hunter Spitzer, At-Large; Adam Beeman, Cedar Grove Township Representative; Carrie Fletcher, 10 <br />Bingham Township Representative; Lydia Wegman (Chair), At-Large Chapel Hill Township Representative; Patricia 11 <br />Roberts, Cheeks Township Representative; 12 13 MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Guthrie, At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township 14 <br />Representative; 15 <br /> 16 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; Patrick Mallett, 17 <br />Planner II; Ashley Moncado, Planner II; 18 <br /> 19 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 20 <br />Chair Lydia Wegman called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. 21 <br /> 22 <br /> 23 AGENDA ITEM 9: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENTS – SUBDIVISION REVIEW 24 <br />PROCESS - To make a recommendation to the BOCC on government-initiated amendments to the 25 <br />text of the UDO that will modify subdivision review processes, in accordance with Session Law 26 <br />2017-10. This item is scheduled for public hearing on June 5, 2018. 27 28 PRESENTER: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 29 <br /> 30 <br />Michael Harvey noted that this item is found in the agenda packet on Pages 48-59. He explained that state law has 31 <br />changed, so the county has to modify its (subdivision review) processes to reflect State regulations. A new category 32 <br />of exempt subdivisions has been created, establishing that a will settling an estate can create a subdivision, which 33 <br />will be exempt from formal county review. Specifically, this applies when a will dictates that the land is to be 34 <br />subdivided for the heirs. This means the Planning Department is not looking at the subdivision for open space, road 35 <br />access, etc. Also, the session law established an expedited subdivision review for tracts of land 5 acres and larger 36 <br />that creates no more than three lots. The Planning Department can only compel the property owner to submit a final 37 <br />plat. The final plat has to meet all the submittal requirements as detailed within Article 7 of the UDO . There are 38 <br />several qualifiers outlining how a property owner can go through the expedited process. Michael Harvey reviewed 39 <br />that the State legislation dictating this removes the concept plan stage that helps a property owner develop a plan 40 <br />that will work before spending money on a surveyor. A lot may be created legally but a home may not be built on it if 41 <br />it does not meet the county’s regulations. He informed the board that these text amendments had received legal 42 <br />sufficiency from the county’s attorney office. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Planning Director Craig Benedict said in other states, planning staff are asked to testify in court on subdividing 45 <br />property when it is dictated in a will to be sure there is proper road access and space for septic. 46 <br /> 47 <br />MOTION by Kim Piracci to approve the statement of consistency. Seconded Hunter Spitzer. 48 VOTE: Unanimous 49 50 MOTION by Hunter Spitzer to recommend approval of the amendment as stated in Attachment 4. Seconded Kim 51 <br />Piracci 52 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 53 <br /> 54 <br />Attachment 3 12