Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 10/19/11 <br />3 <br />107 <br />108 <br />109 <br />110 <br />111 <br />112 <br />113 <br />114 <br />115 <br />116 <br />117 <br />118 <br />119 <br />120 <br />121 <br />122 <br />123 <br />124 <br />125 <br />126 <br />127 <br />128 <br />129 <br />130 <br />131 <br />132 <br />133 <br />134 <br />135 <br />136 <br />137 <br />138 <br />139 <br />140 <br />141 <br />142 <br />143 <br />144 <br />145 <br />146 <br />147 <br />148 <br />149 <br />150 <br />151 <br />152 <br />153 <br />Dan Barker declined a second appointment to serve again. There will be an opening for another Hillsborough <br />person. Tina will send an email with the people that have shown an interest. <br /> <br />MOTION: Paul Guthrie made a motion to recommend reappointment for Jeff Charles. Seconded by Randy Marshall. <br />VOTE: Unanimous <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM VIII: EFLAND-BUCKHORN-MEBANE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TRANSITION ACTIVITY NODES AND <br />ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN <br /> <br /> <br />Craig Benedict stated this item was on the August 23 Quarterly Public Hearing. There is an approval with the City of <br />Durham for utility facilities to be extended into the Eno Economic Development Zone. Craig stated as they promote <br />development they need to ensure they have all the infrastructure items to support them. There are suggestions in <br />the access management that would prompt the developer to connect some other dots. There are changes to the <br />Water and Sewer Management Planning and Boundary Agreement to allow development. As properties <br />development they need to ensure that development is not reviewed on a piece mail basis. There are 26 items <br />different access management issues that can be addressed. If there is an access plan and DOT needs to be move <br />something up to the top this plan will help expedite the issues. Craig continued to review maps. Randy Marshall <br />asked if there was an Access Management Plan adopted. Craig responded there was not but was part of a planned <br />development. <br /> <br />Alan Campbell asked if the issue of whether a road is public or private is that left up to DOT? Craig said it driven by <br />DOT with certain criteria. <br /> <br />There was conversation between several individuals about the access management on the map. Continued <br />presentation. <br /> <br />Nancy Baker asked if this plan was already approved. Craig Benedict responded that it had not been approved. <br />Nancy would like to discuss this at the next meeting. Sam stated that at some time travel time would need to be <br />reduced. Craig will bring the Land Use Planning efforts. At the next meeting they will start with that and go to bike <br />stuff. <br /> <br />Paul Guthrie had a problem with how to monitor the development so there would be a good mix to get the Economic <br />Development that was desired. Randy Marshall noted that there was public hearing and nobody spoke on the plan. <br />Craig Benedict responded that there were 20 people or so to show up. Also, how many times has the Planning <br />Board discussed this issue? Craig responded that the recommendations have had Planning Board review. <br /> <br />Tom Altieri stated that Commissioner Jacobs asked to add the disclaimer to the maps to describe what the dashed <br />lines mean that they are conceptual so that will be added. <br /> <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM IX: BOARD COMMENTS <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM X: ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />There being no further business the meeting was adjourned <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> _______________________________________ <br /> Nancy Baker, Chair