Orange County NC Website
Approved 2/17/10 <br />3 <br /> 110 <br />Karen Lincoln explained that it would require an SUP. 111 <br /> 112 Motion: Sam Lasris made a motion to ban drive-thrus throughout Orange County. No Second 113 <br /> 114 Motion Failed 115 <br /> 116 <br />Paul Guthrie asked for clarification on what constitutes a drive-thru. 117 <br /> 118 <br />Sam Lasris noted that it is specifically talking about fast food restaurants, pharmacies, and banks. He noted that the 119 <br />list could specify what could never be allowed. 120 <br /> 121 <br />Karen Lincoln noted that an SUP allows control of the way in which it is done and also where. Karen explained the 122 <br />options. She noted existing zoning regulations that specify zoning districts and uses allowed in each, noting zoning 123 <br />districts that allow uses for which drive-thrus may be appropriate, and the requirements. She advised the 124 <br />requirements should be related to the Board’s concerns such as environmental, traffic, and safety concerns. She 125 <br />continued that the board’s task is to refine the proposed ordinance definition for drive-thru facilities to clearly and 126 <br />succinctly state uses for which a drive-thru facility as an accessory use would be appropriate/allowed. 127 <br /> 128 <br />Karen Lincoln stated that a drive-thru land use would be an accessory use, which is allowed by right for any use. 129 <br />Current regulations allow uses that would be the type using a drive-thru in Economic Development Districts or 130 <br />Community Commercial Districts. She noted that those were the two she would recommend to allow drive-thrus with 131 <br />specific requirements. She gave a definition of a use that would have a drive-thru as one that provides a service that 132 <br />allows customers to purchase products without leaving their vehicle. Karen noted the reason a service station isn’t 133 <br />included is because the primary use is to sell a product (motor fuels) that is purchased at the vehicle and the gas 134 <br />pumps and canopy would not be an accessory use. 135 <br /> 136 <br />When asked, Karen Lincoln responded that the purpose of the Community Commercial District is to provide suitably 137 <br />located and sized sites for commercial office and service uses including limited automotive convenience, durable 138 <br />goods, and other similar uses. Performance standards will be used to ensure the absence of adverse impacts 139 <br />beyond the zoning district boundaries of the use. She continued they are mostly to be applied to existing community 140 <br />commercial type developments on sites that are within areas designated by the adopted Comprehensive Plan as 141 <br />commercial transition activity nodes. 142 <br /> 143 <br />Paul Guthrie noted his concern regarding the language. He asked if there has been any environment impact review 144 <br />or study done on the all the implications and has there been an economic analysis of the impact. He gave the 145 <br />example that some businesses that could not have drive-ins would have to increase their parking areas, which would 146 <br />have an immediate environmental impact on everything from run-off to air quality, with the starting and stopping of 147 <br />engines. He continued that this would only concern new business and it could have a competitive disadvantage to 148 <br />existing business. 149 <br /> 150 <br />Overlapping conversations 151 <br /> 152 Motion: Nancy Baker moved the Board recommend option 5 some combination of options 2, 3, and 4. Seconded by 153 <br />Bryn Smith. 154 <br /> 155 <br />Randy asked if it would be used in its present form and Karen Lincoln replied it would not. 156 <br /> 157 <br />Sam Lasris responded that it was meant to be for stimulation of discussion and that the motion referred to number 5 158 <br />under item number 6, a combination of the options 2, 3, and 4. 159 <br /> 160 Vote: Passed 5-1 161 <br /> 162