Orange County NC Website
Approved 1/20/10 <br />3 <br />County so she wanted him to tell the Board about the way things used to be and noted that she hopes someday to 110 <br />get back to that place again. 111 <br /> 112 <br />Tom Magnuson advised the Board that his organization’s business is finding and mapping colonial landscapes and 113 <br />the most obvious landscape remnants, the ones that are most constant are the old roads, trails, and paths. He noted 114 <br />that because the topography is clay they hold the indentations. He told the Board that the reason they go out and 115 <br />find them is not because they are valuable but because up until the mid 19th century nobody lived more than a couple 116 <br />of feet from the road. It was the source of information. People would sit on porches and all traffic moved slowly 117 <br />enough to have a conversation while passing and it was the way people stayed informed until rural mail delivery 118 <br />started in the 19th century and people started having long driveways, etc. He noted that most people walked. 119 <br /> 120 <br />Speaker Tom Magnuson continued to educate the OUTBoard members on the history of walking and Orange 121 <br />County. He discussed multiple land sites and their origins throughout the County. He noted that during his research 122 <br />over the past summer they found five cemeteries, four taverns, and three schools that had not been recorded. His 123 <br />presentation included a map and he discussed the original size of the County before it was split and became part of 124 <br />the surrounding counties. Tom recommended that the planning process include some of the historical features of the 125 <br />County in future projects. The Board discussed the possible use of some of the old roads in the pedestrian plan. He 126 <br />suggested that there is value as tourist attractions to be had from some of the sites. He also noted that when some 127 <br />other counties get sewer and water easements they also purchase the right of passage and recommends that 128 <br />Orange County do the same for future trails. 129 <br /> 130 <br />Nancy Baker speculated that perhaps someday the Lands Legacy Program might encourage farmers to donate strips 131 <br />of land, or the right to use the land. 132 <br /> 133 <br />Tom Magnuson also noted an instance where a county purchased the buffer along a river so the farmers wouldn’t 134 <br />incur the burden of cleaning up trees, etc. along the river and in doing so they got some good hiking trails. He noted 135 <br />there a lot of trails and paths in Orange County (many can be found on www.tradingpath.org ) and that his mission of 136 <br />his organization is to find, map, and protect landscape artifacts and remnants from the colonial era. He noted that he 137 <br />is also creating a group called the Historic Mapping Congress and they are going to have a website that the public 138 <br />can go and say ‘there’s a road here…’ or ‘there’s an old tavern there….’ and they will be able to go to the map and 139 <br />draw on the map and it will become a GIS layer. After that is done there will be a data form to fill out telling what it 140 <br />represents. It will then be authenticated by each county. He informed the Board that when that happens there will be 141 <br />a map and say ‘show me where all the taverns are between 1740 and 1760 in Orange County. Tom also let the 142 <br />OUTBoard members know that his organization holds public hikes on the first Sunday of every month and those are 143 <br />advertised on the website. 144 <br /> 145 <br />At the conclusion of the presentation, Nancy Baker informed the Board that the pedestrian plan had held six or seven 146 <br />meetings and one of the things they have done is look for routes. She noted they are also putting together all the 147 <br />lands that are going to be held by groups like Duke Forest that can be accessed by the public. The map they have 148 <br />started also has destinations. Nancy reviewed the map with the group and explained some of the routes. 149 <br /> 150 <br />Amy Cole suggested that the Safe Routes to School project investigate whether or not there are any trading paths 151 <br />near the schools that could be incorporated into the current Safe Routes to School project. They are going to be 152 <br />proposing some options and if there is a possibility there are some historic paths for a pedestrian path to go through 153 <br />it may be even safer for the children to walk than the side of the road. 154 <br /> 155 <br />Karen Lincoln noted that SRTS funds would not include money for purchasing right-of-way but sometimes there are 156 <br />neighborhood paths that kids use. The Safe Routes to School projects are mostly to provide safe crossings, safe 157 <br />routes for bicycles, etc. Karen did advise that once there is a plan, there are various grants for which the County 158 <br />can apply to help with greenway trails. She agrees it would be good to find out if there are any historic landscapes. 159 <br /> 160 <br />Jeff Charles suggested that the bicycling community involved as many also spend a lot of time hiking. 161 <br /> 162 <br />Nancy Baker added that there is also the horseback community to consider. 163