Browse
Search
OUTBoard minutes 111908
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Minutes
>
2008
>
OUTBoard minutes 111908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2018 3:46:31 PM
Creation date
5/31/2018 3:46:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/19/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 2/18/09 <br />3 <br />Karen Lincoln advised that there would only be commuter rail in areas where people want it and where the local 111 <br />areas support it and can provide the rail transit operational services. 112 <br /> 113 <br />Paul Guthrie suggested a map overlaying the commuter rail with the light rail. He thinks the viability will be very high 114 <br />due to costs and that loop routes are far more inexpensive to operate than dead end routes. There is a right of way 115 <br />to make that connection. So by the time this happens you could have a circular route in Orange County from 116 <br />University Station down to the south side of Chapel Hill going back up to the east side of Chapel Hill and making that 117 <br />transit loop. It is also less neighborhood-disturbing. 118 <br /> 119 <br />Sam Lasris asked where bus feeder services fits in. Where does the private sector fit and will the facilities be 120 <br />available. 121 <br /> 122 <br />Eric Tillman commented that by 2035, government will be totally in control of transportation. The overhead is so high 123 <br />that it won’t be worth it to try to feed into these options at all. Private transportation providers will be totally 124 <br />eliminated. He believes there will not be enough business to sustain private transportation enterprises. The 125 <br />business is shrinking partly due to the massive overhead involved. 126 <br /> 127 <br />Paul Guthrie responded that it would be more accurate on light rail but on rail commuter connectivity is essential to a 128 <br />distribution system. He added that there are two factors, location and population increase. As density increases that 129 <br />kind of equation will change significantly. 130 <br /> 131 <br />Eric Tillman responded that the private sector is paying taxes into a system that is slowly eliminating it and that the 132 <br />use of private industry should be incorporated into the plan along with government expansion of transportation. 133 <br /> 134 <br />Sam Lasris suggested that in the comments going back that the suggestion to include more in regard to the private 135 <br />sector in the plan. 136 <br /> 137 <br />Paul Guthrie added that it should go beyond that to include the private sector being totally involved in the process. 138 <br /> 139 <br />On discussing the options Paul Guthrie stated that he was not comfortable with the amount of information in order to 140 <br />choose an option. He thinks in the next 48 months there will be large scale access to capital to start funding these. I 141 <br />think you’ll see massive investments from federal government, job creating enterprises, transit extension is going to 142 <br />be one of those. I think strategically we should move all of this forward but always keep an eye on that long-range 143 <br />objective of building the total system. Sam Lasris added that commuter rail makes sense and thinks it should be part 144 <br />of the plans. 145 <br /> 146 <br />Karen Lincoln talked about the fact that when constraining the plan this says where the federal dollars are to go 147 <br />which means not widening, and not doing the improvements for the commuter rail and not providing money to 148 <br />Triangle Transit to operate commuter rail service. We’ll have to work the best we can with what we have. She 149 <br />advised that the local source revenue is assuming ½ cent increase in Durham and Orange County sales tax and ¼ 150 <br />increase in Chatham County from 2011 through 2035 and an additional $10 car registration fee in those counties. 151 <br />Chapel Hill already has authority for a $10 registration fee so it would be $20 in Chapel Hill. Those are the additional 152 <br />revenues forecast. Also because the other systems will take time to put in place, some road improvements are 153 <br />proposed since some of those can be done quickly. High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes have been included. 154 <br />Recommended highway improvements are also partly related to the TIP funding sources where certain money can 155 <br />only be used for certain things. 156 <br /> 157 <br />Nancy Baker pointed out the connectivity problem with RTP and that the routes go from Chapel Hill and Raleigh to 158 <br />Durham and then to RTP and that a direct rail route to RTP should be added. 159 <br /> 160 <br />Karen Lincoln advised that it was partly a right of way issue. A major investment study has already been done for 161 <br />the US 15-501 corridor. 162 <br /> 163 <br />Consensus was to see both light rail and commuter rail in the final option and to ensure that the private transportation 164 <br />providers are included in the process and utilization of the privates carriers at the end points of transportation links. 165 <br />166
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.