Browse
Search
OUTBoard minutes 111908
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Minutes
>
2008
>
OUTBoard minutes 111908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2018 3:46:31 PM
Creation date
5/31/2018 3:46:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/19/2008
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 2/18/09 <br />2 <br />for commuter rail, and is not a market study. NCRR is a private corporation owned completely by the State of North 56 <br />Carolina. 57 <br /> 58 <br />Paul Guthrie pointed out the route structure and shared route information and that the big challenge is the connector 59 <br />feeder lines that support the infrastructure. 60 <br /> 61 <br />Alice Gordon advised that the consultant was asked to work with the two MPOs trying to get a seamless interface 62 <br />and they agreed. That could really be important to get something concrete, something on the ground then you could 63 <br />protect the corridor. 64 <br /> 65 <br />Nancy Baker updated the Board on the Safe Routes to School and advised she and Karen Lincoln had met with the 66 <br />consultants and the consultants are working out the scope of work details with DOT. Once that is done they can start 67 <br />planning some meetings. 68 <br /> 69 <br />Karen Lincoln announced that the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Comprehensive Plan with revisions. 70 <br />Also, the commissioners approved all the reappointments to the OUTBoard. 71 <br /> 72 <br />Alice Gordon shared the reasoning behind the changes to the OUTBoard’s proposal and that she hopes that they 73 <br />feel that all the good work was still there. She let everyone know how much she appreciates the hard work. She 74 <br />explained about the paperwork used for the MPO and the criteria dealing with environmental impacts. 75 <br /> 76 IV. Approval of Minutes 77 78 <br />The approval of minutes was deferred to the next OUTBoard meeting. 79 <br /> 80 V. Comments regarding four (4) fiscally constrained options to be considered for the Preferred Option 81 for the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro (DCHC) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2035 Long 82 Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) 83 <br /> 84 <br />Karen Lincoln gave a handout on the four options. The first transit option is an intensive bus system having no fixed 85 <br />guideway service but lots of local bus system expansion with peak headways of 10-20 minutes and off peak 86 <br />headways of 15-30 minutes. This would also included expansion of the express buses and regional bus expansion 87 <br />to more communities and employment center circulators. The second option is commuter rail. It would have the 88 <br />same intensity as bus transit and would have more bus feeder service to the commuter rail stations, with commuter 89 <br />service from Hillsborough to downtown Durham to RTP to downtown Raleigh and eastward. Paul Guthrie interjected 90 <br />that there was equal emphasis going westbound to Burlington/Greensboro. Karen Lincoln added that some of the 91 <br />bus services are also looking into that area. The commuter rail from Durham to Carrboro would be via the spur at 92 <br />university station that runs southwest to Carrboro. This option also includes bus rapid transit from downtown 93 <br />Durham to UNC Chapel Hill, but no light rail. The fourth option is the Special Transit Advisory Commission (STAC) 94 <br />recommendation for the diesel multiple unit (DMU) technology, from Duke to downtown Raleigh in the corridor 95 <br />proposed for the first phase of the “old” Triangle Transit regional rail program with light rail transit from Duke to UNC 96 <br />where there is no existing rail corridor. There is a new alternative, option 4, that is uses only electric light rail for all 97 <br />fixed guideway. An initial analysis indicated much greater ridership in the same corridor for the light rail option than 98 <br />for the split modal option (DMU and light rail). The difference is because you lose riders every time riders have to 99 <br />change mode to complete a trip. 100 <br /> 101 <br />Alice Gordon added that there was a meeting of the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) of the two MPOs in 102 <br />the Triangle area. The Transportation Advisory Committee is the governing board of the Metropolitan Planning 103 <br />Organization (MPO) and is composed of elected officials. The two TACs met and both governing boards were 104 <br />interested in the new option for light rail. People think it is a good long-range vision and they think that electric is a 105 <br />good vision. The elected officials said they are supporting the light rail/electric option. It’s very likely that the 106 <br />Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro (DCHC) MPO TAC is going to adopt the light rail option the two MPOs thought was 107 <br />best. There are some costs options they were also willing to approve. When it went out for public comment, there 108 <br />were four transit options. Now it looks like the emerging consensus is for light rail. 109 <br /> 110
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.