Orange County NC Website
(3) The Contractor agrees that the RFP method, in accordance with FTA Circular <br />4220.I F, under the guidelines of FTA "Best Practices Procurement Manual," should: be used for <br />proCUrernents of professional services, such as consultants for planning activities and for transit system <br />operations /management. The Contractor acknowledges that certain restrictions apply under North <br />Carolina law for use of the RFP method and these restrictions and exceptions are discussed in <br />Subsections 14t(1) and '14t(2) of this Agreement. For all architectural, engineering, design, or related <br />services, the Contractor agrees that the qualifications- based competitive proposal process shall be <br />used (see Subsection, 14q, this Agreement). <br />(4) When the RFP method is used for procurement of professional services, the <br />Contractor agrees to abide by the following rninimurn reqUirernents: <br />(a) Normally conducted with more than one source submitting ail <br />offer (proposal); <br />(b) Either fixed price or cost reimbursement type contract will be <br />used; <br />(c) Generally used when conditions are not appropriate for use of <br />sealed bids-, <br />(d) Requests for proposals will be publicized,' <br />(e) All evaluation factors will be identified along with their relative <br />importance; <br />(f) Proposals will be solicited from an adequate number (3 is <br />recommended) Of qualified sources; <br />(g) A standard method must be in place for conducting technical <br />evaluations of the proposals received and for selecting <br />awardees; <br />(h) Awards will be made to the responsible firm whose proposal is <br />most advantageous to the Contractor's program with price and <br />other factors considered; and <br />(i), In determining which proposal) is most advantageous, the <br />Contractor may award to the proposer whose proposal offers the <br />greatest business value (best value) to the agency. "Best value" <br />is based oil determination of which proposal offers the best <br />tradeoff between price and performance, where quality is <br />considered an integral performance factor. <br />U. Award to Other than the Lowest Bidder. In accordance with Federal and St,ate <br />statutes, a third party contract may be awarded to other than the lowest bidder, if the award furthers an <br />objective (Such as improved long-term operating efficiency and lower long-term costs). When specified <br />in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation costs, and life cycle costs willl be <br />considered in determining which bid is lowest. Prior to the award of any contract equal to or greater <br />than $2,500 to other than apparent lowest bidder, the Contractor shall Submit its recommendation along <br />with basis/reason for selection to the Department for pre-award approval. <br />V, Award to Responsible Contractors, The Contractor agrees to award third party <br />contracts only to responsible contractors who possess potential ability to Successfully perform under <br />the terms and conditions of the proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as <br />contractor integrity, cornpliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and <br />technical resources. Contracts will not be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or <br />otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities in <br />accordance with the Federal debarment and Suspension rule, 49 C.F.I. 29, For procurements over <br />$25,000, the Contractor shall comply, and assure the compliance of each third party contractor and <br />subrecipient at any tier, with the debarment and suspension rule. FTA and the Department recommend <br />that grantees use a certification form for projects over $25,000, which are funded in part with Federal <br />funds. A sarnple certification form can be obtained frorn the Department, The Contractor also agrees to <br />Updated 91 17/10 Page 4 9 of 35 <br />