CHATPEC 111402 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Meeting Summary - October 29, 2002 Members Present: Margaret Brown, Alice Gordon, Wendy Bryan, Jay Bryan, Gloria Faley, Delores Simpson, Judson Edeburn, Johnny Randall, Bill Strom, Doris Murrell, Robb English, Judy Margolis, Renee Price, Kory Wilmot, Terri Tyson, Matthew Barton, Kathy Kaufman, Nick Didow, Patrick Sullivan, Jeanette Moore. Members Absent: Joe Herzenberg, Elizabeth Brown, John Herrera. Staff Present: David Stancil, Lori Taft, Steve Scroggs, Bill Mullin, Kimberly Siran, Tina Moon, Carol Rosemond, Craig Benedict, John Link, Gwen Harvey. Commissioners Alice Gordon and Margaret Brown called the meeting to order and asked everyone to introduce themselves to the new county Recreation & Parks Director Lori Taft. Commissioner Brown called for changes to the agenda. The meeting summary of September 30, 2002 was approved unanimously with Bill Strom making motion to approve the meeting summary, seconded by Doris Murrell. Members reviewed the work group ground rules and adopted them unanimously. Members shared their initial site observations of the site visits (see details "Initial Site Observations "). In summary these items were noted as requiring more research: More info on powerline (access, electromagnetic) New aerials of site enlarged for future meetings ➢ Geological issues (rock) to be addressed as the design proceeds ➢ Need to engage OWASA on different utility configurations - how does it affect water /sewer. Is there flexibility in standards on placement of gravity sewer lines along streams (offset). ➢ Consider opportunities to de- emphasize the road David Stancil noted that staff has done a lot of what is involved in looking at the external factors in the staff report "Challenges and Opportunities ". I At the next meeting it is planned to continue the discussion, to begin to think about the implications of soils, topography and other features — to share those before beginning to look at menus of different potential park/recreation activities or school uses. This will also allow the group to begin to assess exactly what external factors in terms of infrastructure are going to impact the site. Irony of some of the information is that one needs to know enough about what will be designed in order to efficiently research further detailed information (example, geological samples). Work group must try to strike that balance over the next couple of months. Strom noted the need to converse with OWASA to get a sense of utility configurations /advantages of building locations — a find out now what approach is best. Stancil reported that staff met with OWASA in the development of the pre- concept plan and indicated these lines as their