Browse
Search
CHATPEC 021303
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Advisory Boards and Work Groups - Inactive
>
Chapel Hill Township Park and Ed Campus Master Plan Work Group
>
Agendas
>
CHATPEC 021303
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2018 3:02:48 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 3:02:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/13/2003
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UN <br />Attachment 4 <br />To: CHATPEC Work Group <br />From: David Stancil, Environment and Resource Conservation Director <br />Date: February 6, 2003 <br />Re: Draft "Menu" List of Potential Facilities <br />One of the important steps in designing the park and educational campus is the <br />brainstorming of a master list of potential facilities — a list that can be refined and <br />"whittled down" over time to a final set of recommended facilities for the site. <br />To facilitate the discussion, staff has taken 1) the submitted community needs <br />from the advisory boards and school board, 2) the needs identified in the 1999 <br />Joint Master Recreation and Parks (JMRP) report, and 3) other ideas that have <br />been generated by staff, to develop a list to start the discussion. Another way to <br />consider this list is as a "menu," options that the work group (and the soon- to -be- <br />formed "Schools" and "Park" subcommittees) might choose and select from. <br />Eventually, as it is refined, the master list will form the basis and framework of <br />the eventual recommended facilities and design, and the ultimate Master Plan. <br />In order to start with as broad a palette as possible, the attached staff draft list is <br />comprehensive of many potential facilities as we could identify — without regard <br />to desirability, practicality of siting, or cost. The goal of this initial discussion is to <br />think "outside of the box," and make sure the base is as broad as possible for <br />initial consideration. Relative desirability of facilities, cost, what the• site can <br />feasibly sustain from a natural and structural standpoint — all are important <br />issues, but ones that would be the focus of future meetings and discussions. As <br />such, this staff list should be viewed as simply a starting point. The action we <br />propose for this meeting is review, and then an initial refinement of the master <br />list. <br />We propose to conduct the exercise of generating /refining a "Master List" in' the <br />following fashion: <br />1. The Work Group will be asked to review the recommendations from the <br />County and Town advisory boards, the needs identified in the 1999 JMRP <br />report (asking clarifying questions as needed), and the staff draft master <br />list (attached herein - which includes all of the above as well as additional <br />potential facility ideas) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.