Browse
Search
HPC 013002
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Historic Preservation Commission
>
Agendas
>
2002
>
HPC 013002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2018 2:59:50 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 2:58:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/30/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N <br />The federal and state guidelines for the Certified Local Government Program require that <br />the CLGs participate in the process of nominating properties to the National Register of <br />Historic Places. This participation involves the review of nominations within the <br />jurisdiction of the CLG by the CLG Commission and the chief elected local official. <br />Opportunity for public comment must be provided during the 60 -day comment period. <br />The commission and the chief elected official are required to submit comments to the <br />State Historic Preservation Office and the. owner of the property relaying their findings as <br />to the eligibility of the property under consideration for listing in the National Register. <br />The attached forms are provided for you to facilitate your review of nominations and your <br />submittal of comments to the State Historic Preservation Office. A copy of the criteria for <br />listing in the National Register is also enclosed for your reference and use. <br />Although the federal regulations governing the CLG program call for the chief elected <br />local official to provide comments on proposed National Register nominations within the <br />CLG jurisdiction, North Carolina law stipulates that the mayor or chairman of the board <br />of county commissioners may act only in an administrative capacity on behalf of the local <br />governing board. If a certified local government has doubts about the legality of the chief <br />elected official assuming sole responsibility for comments on proposed National Register <br />nominations, it may wish to consider two alternatives: 1) having the governing board <br />review the nominations or 2) having the governing board pass a resolution granting the <br />chief elected local official the authority to furnish comments on behalf of the governing <br />board. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.