| am 
<br />HISTORIC REHABILITATION TAX CREDITS 
<br />continued from page I 
<br />to Gary Stenson, president of 
<br />MetroPlains Development, 
<br />LLC, based in St. Paul, Min - 
<br />nesota: "It can be costly to reha- 
<br />bilitate historic, often vacant, 
<br />buildings. But the federal 
<br />historic tax credits help greatly. 
<br />In fact, there is a lot of develop- 
<br />ment that wouldn't have gotten 
<br />done without them, Also they 
<br />can be used to leverage other 
<br />funds. And so in the end, 
<br />historic rehabilitation can be 
<br />just as cost - effective as new 
<br />construction." 
<br />The National Trust and 
<br />the National Housing 
<br />and Rehabilitation 
<br />Association have formed 
<br />a new Historic Preserva- 
<br />tion Development 
<br />Council... to push for a 
<br />set ofamendments 
<br />to... make the tax credit a 
<br />more effective tool, 
<br />During the past 23 years, 
<br />MetroPlains has completed 
<br />more than 70 real estate devel- 
<br />opment projects in 10 Midwest- 
<br />ern states, about half involving 
<br />substantial rehabilitations of 
<br />historic buildings. MetroPlains 
<br />has tackled the adaptive use 
<br />of old schools, hotels, hospitals, 
<br />office buildings, post offices, 
<br />apartment buildings, and fire 
<br />stations, inmost cases rehabili- 
<br />tating these buildings into 
<br />multifamily rental apartments. 
<br />Federal historic rehabilitation 
<br />tax credits were utilized in 32 of 
<br />these developments, involving 
<br />the preservation of more than 
<br />40 historic buildings which 
<br />are now listed in the National 
<br />Register of Historic Places. 
<br />Typically, the federal historic 
<br />rehabilitation tax credit has 
<br />fit into a financing package that 
<br />might also include state and 
<br />local preservation incentives 
<br />as well as financing programs 
<br />for affordable housing and com- 
<br />munity development. 
<br />Based on his experience 
<br />using the credits, Stenson has 
<br />some suggestions for improve- 
<br />ments to the existing tax credit 
<br />program. "We should do what 
<br />we can to make the historic tax 
<br />credit more compatible with 
<br />the low- income housing tax 
<br />credit. We usually use the tools 
<br />together, but there are some 
<br />inconsistencies between the 
<br />two, which should be resolved. 
<br />"It would also be good for 
<br />smaller projects to have an 
<br />even larger credit because there 
<br />is a lot of work involved in any 
<br />rehabilitation project, regardless 
<br />of its size. So if you have a small 
<br />project, say a million dollar proj- 
<br />ect, a lot of the transaction costs 
<br />are going to be similar to a $10 
<br />million project, but your return 
<br />is not as great, so it's a little 
<br />tougher to make the deal work." 
<br />Proposed Changes to the 
<br />Tax Code 
<br />Other organizations and individ- 
<br />uals who have worked with the 
<br />credits over the past 25 years also 
<br />see the need for improvements 
<br />to the existing program. As a 
<br />result, the National Trust and 
<br />the National Housing and 
<br />Rehabilitation Association have 
<br />formed a new Historic Preserva- 
<br />tion Development Council. 
<br />One of the goals of the council is 
<br />to push for a set of amendments 
<br />to the Internal Revenue Code. 
<br />These would make the tax cred- 
<br />it a more effective tool for 
<br />attracting equity investment 
<br />into historic rehabilitation 
<br />projects, particularly smaller 
<br />projects in community develop- 
<br />ment areas. During a series of 
<br />meetings held last year, a group 
<br />of preservationists, developers, 
<br />lawyers, and accountants dis- 
<br />cussed the following amend- 
<br />ments to the tax code: 
<br />Eliminate the need to demonstrate 
<br />a profitmotive "forundertaking 
<br />historic rehabilitation projects, 
<br />The IRS generally disallows any 
<br />deductions associated with 
<br />activities that have not been 
<br />entered into for profit. But 
<br />given that investors in housing 
<br />credit transactions could not 
<br />possibly demonstrate the requi- 
<br />site profit motive because they 
<br />invest solely for the tax benefits, 
<br />the low - income housing credit 
<br />program has a blanket exemp- 
<br />tion. A similar exemption 
<br />would be helpful for historic 
<br />credit developments, where the 
<br />tax credits are often the primary 
<br />motive for making the invest- 
<br />ment. This would go a long way 
<br />toward raising investor confi- 
<br />dence that the Internal Rev- 
<br />enue Service will respect his- 
<br />toric tax credit investments. 
<br />Increase the tax credit for small 
<br />projects andprojeets in 
<br />`Difficult - -to- Develop Areas. " 
<br />By any conventional standard, 
<br />the historic tax credit is a shal- 
<br />low subsidy, less than one- 
<br />quarter of the credit allowed 
<br />for the low - income housing tax 
<br />credit. The shallow subsidy issue 
<br />is particularly acute for smaller 
<br />developments because the 
<br />potential tax credit from such 
<br />projects is simply too small to 
<br />attract equity capital from insti- 
<br />tutional investors. An increase 
<br />in the credit to 40 percent is 
<br />being sought for small historic 
<br />projects (under $2.5 million 
<br />in total development costs) 
<br />to assure that there can be 
<br />enough equity raised to cover 
<br />the related transactions costs. 
<br />continued onpage 6 
<br />jortim news 
<br />Peter H. Brink 
<br />Senior Vice President Programs 
<br />Katherine Adams 
<br />Director, Preservation Services 
<br />Elizabeth Byrd Wood 
<br />Program Manager, National Trust Forum 
<br />Kerd Rubman 
<br />Editor 
<br />Bruce Yarnall 
<br />Business Manager 
<br />The mission of the National Tout ((it Historic Presenmtion 
<br />is to provide leadership, cducatim, and advocacy to save 
<br />America's diverse places and revitalim our communities. 
<br />Fannie Neux ANews(etterof ate NationalTrast for Historic 
<br />Preservation (ISSN 1079 -1-i i l; USPS Publi.timt No. 013- 
<br />083) is published bimonthly by the National Trust for 
<br />Historic Pmervatian, 1785 Massachuseas Avenue, N.W., 
<br />Washingmn D.C.20036 asa benelkofNationalTnut Forum 
<br />membership. Pomm members also receive four issues of 
<br />Forme Jorind and six issues pf PRESERVATION. 
<br />Annual dues are $115. Periodicals postage paid at 
<br />Washington D.C. and at additional mailing o6ice. Postmas- 
<br />sent Send address changes to FonweNetur. ANewslenerof the 
<br />National Trust for Historic Preservation, NationatTnut for 
<br />Historic Preservation, 1785 Nforachusetu Avenue, N W., 
<br />Washington, D.C., 20036. Copytight2002NationalTrust 
<br />for Historic Preservation in the United States. Printed in the 
<br />Unitedstates. of the total amountof base annual dues, $6 is 
<br />far a subscription to PRESERVATION for one year. 
<br />Support for the National Trost is provided by membership 
<br />dues; endowment funds; individual, mrponre, and 
<br />foundation contributions; and grants from state and federal 
<br />agencies. Forum Minor is a forum in which to express 
<br />opinions, encourage debate, and convey information of 
<br />importance andofgenerai interest to Forum numbers of ate 
<br />National Trust. Indusion of material or product references 
<br />doeenorcomtimtean endormmembv die National Trust for 
<br />His[o[ie fteserwdon.To obtain petmiuimt to reprin[anypart 
<br />of dtis publication pleasecall (202) 588 -6053. 
<br />F O R U M 
<br />NATIONAL TRUST 
<br />for$ISTORIC PRESERVATION-- 
<br />. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .E. O. .R. .U. .M N E. W .S. 
<br /> |