Browse
Search
APB agenda 112701
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Agricultural Preservation Board
>
Agendas
>
2001
>
APB agenda 112701
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2018 2:13:58 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 2:13:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/27/2001
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
26 <br />a farm bill that sends the vast majority of money to just 10 <br />states," points out Susanne Fleek, director of government <br />relations for EWG. "What we're really talking about is <br />transforming the way the government thinks about farm <br />policy —it has so much impact on Americans' daily lives, in <br />everything from the food we eat to the water we drink." <br />One of the strengths AFT brings to the coalition is its <br />research capacity. Starting last fall, AFT planned a series of <br />research projects to help shape the new legislation. It's a <br />simple but vital part of the legislative process: By providing <br />objective and verifiable data for legislators to make strong <br />arguments, it is more likely that champions of strong con- <br />servation programs will win their fights in committee meet- <br />ings and on the floor of Congress. Working with involved <br />funders like The Joyce Foundation, the first piece AFT <br />crafted was a national voter opinion poll to bring the voice <br />of the people to legislators in Washington. <br />"This is What We Want" <br />Susan Butler farms with her brothers and other family <br />members in Montgomery County, Maryland, a mere 25 <br />miles from the nation's capital. They use their land to grow <br />pick - your -own fniits and vegetables. In June, Butler came <br />to Washington to offer the opening remarks to a packed <br />press conference releasing the results of AFT's national <br />poll. She talked about the pressures of farming in a heavily <br />urbanized county, even one that has made a strong com- <br />mitment to keeping agriculture. <br />"We have generations and generations that are coming <br />to visit and pick at the farm," Butler explained. "But there <br />are pressures— someone wants to put a transmission tower <br />on the farm, a new ex -urban neighbor across the road <br />doesn't like the noise we create in our berry patch, and traf- <br />fic around the farm has gotten terrible." <br />The results of the national voter opinion poll released in <br />June not only support Butler and other farmers, but show <br />that Americans have a clear sense of what well- managed <br />farmland provides. And not only do voters know about <br />federal payments to farmers, they support them —but they <br />want the payments linked to conservation. <br />The poll was conducted by the Public Opinion <br />Research Lab at Northern Illinois University, under the <br />leadership of political scientist Dr. J. Dixon Esseks, who <br />has been surveying agricultural issues for close to 20 years. <br />"What really jumped out at us was the solid connection <br />between agriculture and conservation in the mind of the <br />voter," explained Esseks. "Over the past 19 years I have <br />repeatedly surveyed farmers and found them very willing <br />to conserve natural resources. These new results strongly <br />indicate that conservation- oriented farm programs will <br />please not just farmers, but most voters" <br />When asked a balanced question about what people <br />value in farms and ranches, 58 percent of voters listed <br />wildlife habitat as something they valued "highly" as a <br />O <br />0 <br />a <br />F <br />U <br />O <br />s <br />0 <br />Susan Butler at Butler's Orchard has watched the farm be <br />slowly encircled by housing developments (right). <br />quality of farms and ranches. When adding in those who <br />value that quality "moderately," the result was a strong 82 <br />percent who see "providing wildlife habitat" as a key value <br />of farms and ranches. Scenic beauty was next, with 46 per- <br />cent "highly" valuing it and 77 percent combined, and <br />recreational opportunities came in at 32 percent "highly" <br />and 58 percent combined. These are all conservation qual- <br />ities— things that the American public wants to "buy" from <br />farmers and ranchers through conservation programs. <br />In presenting poll results, Grossi pointed out that voters <br />are concerned about the impact of not having conservation <br />programs in agriculture. <br />"In a question on voter concerns that included some <br />non - agricultural items, the stewardship problems rose to <br />the top of the concern list," said Grossi. "And in the con- <br />text of major public policy themes like better education <br />and energy issues, we found that a majority of voters -53 <br />percent —would like to spend more federal dollars to keep <br />farmland from being developed." <br />The poll, now being expanded to provide regionalized <br />results, has become a helpful tool in starting discussions <br />and informing decisions. Through media coverage and cre- <br />ation of a hand -out for legislators, AFT and its allies will <br />use the results to drive home the need for effective, well - <br />funded conservation programs in the upcoming legislation. <br />Laying Out the Plan <br />Before breaking for the end -of- summer recess, the U.S. <br />House of Representatives Agriculture Committee put forth <br />their version of the farm bill. That's the first shot fired in a <br />16 AMERICAN FARMLAND FALL 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.