Orange County NC Website
a preservation <br />report Coverings the policies, practices and initiatives <br />that save farmland and open space <br />Since 1990 # Deborah Bowen, Editor <br />Lot rights at ,1 -50 density proposed for Md. preserved farms <br />ANNAPOLIS, MD — Farms preserved in Maryland <br />should come with development rights attached, at <br />a density of one house per 50 acres, according to a <br />Policy Review Committee recommendation <br />backed by program director Paul W. Scheidt. The <br />change in policy would be a by -right allowance <br />that would run with the land. <br />The Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation <br />Foundation approved for distribution and review, <br />Feb. 20, a memorandum on the proposed change. <br />The proposal comes during a period of program <br />review by a task force appointed by the governor <br />last fall and charged with recommending im= <br />provements by July T. The Policy Review Commit- <br />tee is separate from the task force, and includes <br />three local program administrators, two of whom <br />opposed the policy as written. <br />The policy would replace the program's. <br />existing "child's lot" and "owner's lot" allowances <br />that have been difficult for staff to administer, and <br />annoying for the Foundation board to approve, <br />according to Scheidt, who explained the changes <br />to a task force subcommittee studying program <br />procedures March 1. <br />The proposed policy will eliminate the need to <br />focus on who is requesting and who will be <br />residing in homes on preserved farms and create <br />more flexibility "by expanding the right to con- <br />struct dwellings to include subsequent owners <br />and not limiting the use of such dwellings, "the <br />please tum to page 2 <br />Oregon property.rights measure ruled unconstitutional <br />PORTLAND, OR — A property rights compensation <br />measure passed by Oregon voters last fall that <br />would clearly have been the nation's most strin- <br />gent, has been ruled unconstitutional by an Ore- <br />gon circuit court judge. The issue, however, could <br />be revisited in another ballot measure in Novem- <br />ber 2002. <br />Marion County Judge Paul Lipscomb, who <br />issued an injunction to stop the law from going <br />into effect in December, wrote in a 110 -page <br />opinion that the measure violates the state's <br />constitution because it made "direct and substan- <br />tive changes" to Section 18 of the Constitution <br />"without giving any notice to the voters." The <br />judge also concluded that the measure contained <br />multiple amendments when the Constitution <br />requires that voters vote separately on different <br />please turn to page 3 <br />Volume 11, Number 5 March 2001 <br />inside this issue ... <br />$10,000 per acre cap could be lifted in Pa .................... p. 4 <br />Points -based appraisals formally approved by feds ... p. 4 <br />Maryland takes steps to speed process ......................... p. 4 <br />Ca. study on farmer motivation to sell easements ..... p. 6 <br />Legislative briefs ............................. ............................... p. 6,7 <br />Bowers Farmland Preservation Report is published 10 times per year. Subscription rate of $185 includes index and hotline service. Editorial and <br />Publishing, Inc. circulation offices- 9W La Grange Rd., Street, Maryland 21154 • (410) 692 -2708 • ISSN: 1050 -6373. © 2001 by Bowers Publishing, Inc. <br />Reproduction in any form, or forwarding of this material electronically without permission from the publisher is prohibited. <br />