Browse
Search
APB agenda 032101
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Agricultural Preservation Board
>
Agendas
>
2001
>
APB agenda 032101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2018 2:04:29 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 2:03:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/21/2001
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 Page 3 <br />agriculture to the county, and what is being grown. Compare it to existing roads <br />and projected. growth to get a sense of what the county will look like in twenty <br />years. Then you can get into specific suggestions such as processing facilities, <br />marketing resources, and capital availability. Other ideas include a promotional <br />newspaper, which lists local farms and a yearly farm breakfast, which is a <br />chance for farmers to show what they are doing, have local _officials show their <br />support, and get people to see how nice it is to have farms around them. <br />Morrow noted the ongoing work of SOCF and the APB's recommendations for <br />more VAD program incentives and getting the county commissions to fund and <br />enact regulations necessary to get those. Strayhorn noted that we have only <br />marginal agriculture land in Orange County and all the things that put pressure <br />on good agriculture lands such as universities and hospitals. It's a tough battle <br />for the farmer to make a decent living on the land considering the surrounding <br />pressures. Cohn noted that unfortunately the agriculture that NC has <br />traditionally been based on tobacco, corn, and beans are at an all time low. <br />Strayhorn noted that tobacco has been the one product that farmers could grow <br />on a small. farm, and make a living and raise a family. Now that tobacco <br />production is on the decline, we're trying to find things we can use to fill that gap. <br />Ranells asked about tax relief and how the APB could recommend something <br />like that. Cohn said that the Farm Bureau is best resource as far as tax <br />opportunity. Discussion of use value taxation ensued, including thoughts that <br />the average non -farm taxpayer thinks that farmers are paying less taxes than <br />they are. They don't realize that the farmer pays the same taxes as others on <br />their house, lot and equipment. One suggestion was that VAD participants <br />should receive reduced use value taxation. <br />Morrow asked how the APB can use the AFT to learn, new things and to get <br />advice about things such as wording on the VAD application. Morrow noted that <br />the APB is grappling with the language on the VAD agreement document. We're <br />trying to be specific in a small document. Discussion continued about why <br />anyone would want to be in the VAD program. Strayhorn said that it has to be a <br />personal commitment and love for the land. Tate noted that her family is <br />dedicated to the farm operation, as well as her son, and they want to keep the <br />farm going. That is the reason they joined the VAD program. In talking with <br />estate planners it is not recommended to plan further than one generation <br />because what you plan might be a hindrance rather than a help to the next <br />generation. Goodwin noted that farmers are reluctant to tie up their land in <br />perpetuity and asked how the AFT deals with this sort of problem. Cohn replied <br />that they, very respectfully, consider everyone's situation. That is why he <br />encourages communities to have a range of alternatives for people in different <br />situations. <br />Draft 2/21/2001 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.