Browse
Search
APB agenda 021903
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Agricultural Preservation Board
>
Agendas
>
2003
>
APB agenda 021903
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2018 2:04:23 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 2:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/19/2003
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br />1. Reduced Residential Densities in the Rural Areas — This strategy ties in directly with <br />the CPLUC suggestion on density reduction. Density will vary, though generally it <br />will decrease with distance from an urban area. Watersheds will serve as the <br />geographic context in which density reductions will occur. Planning staff <br />recommends the map titled "Growth Scenario III" on page 4a as the starting point for <br />discussions on future rural densities. Also proposed (through amendments to the <br />Subdivision Regulations) will be increases in the amount of preserved open space <br />required of new development. For example, the Flexible Development provisions of <br />the Subdivision Regulations at 50% require <br />Areas of reduced density couldp space <br />requirements will be targeted function as <br />"sending areas" for a future TDR program. <br />2. Major Subdivisions Limited to Areas with Urban Infrastructure — Major subdivisions <br />(five lots or more) are to be directed to urban or urbanizing areas (these areas will <br />also serve as "receiving areas" for a. future TDR program). The means by which to <br />mitigate the impacts of more intense development, e.g., water and sewer, storm - <br />water drainage, transit, and street networks designed for heavy traffic volumes, <br />exists (or will be provided) in such areas. Likewise, proximity to employment, <br />shopping, schools, and services makes for more efficient commuting and, less total <br />road miles traveled. Finally, the per capita costs of providing governmental services <br />such as fire and police protection, education, sanitation, a recreational and <br />cultural opportunities are less where development patter ns e compact as opposed <br />to sprawling and uncoordinated. <br />3. A Clearly Defined Urban Growth Boundary (UGB1— A UGB.around Hillsborough is <br />proposed. This boundary will be composed of interim (five year) and ultimate (20 <br />year) components. A map would be developed with the Town of Hillsborough to <br />propose such a boundary. The UGB provides the basis for items 1 and 2 discussed <br />above to be accomplished. Reduced residential densities and greater open space <br />will occur outside the boundary while major subdivision activity will occur within the <br />UGB. Policies will be developed so that development occurs first in the interim UGB <br />(including Efland, Durham, and Mebane) and proceeds outward in an incremental <br />fashion. <br />4. Sustainable Minimum Lot Size (1996 USGS Water- Resources Report, "Ground - <br />Water Recharge to the Regolith- Fractured Crystalline Rock Aquifer System, Orange <br />County, North Carolina ") — The report states, "In order to determine the maximum <br />population that can be supplied by ground water, planners and managers must know <br />the amount of ground water that can be withdrawn without exceeding recharge and <br />(or) overdrafting water in long -term storage." Ground -water resources in the 12 <br />basins and sub - basins of Orange County were analyzed and recharge rates for each <br />were estimated. Examples were given of the minimum sustainable lot size needed <br />to serve a single - family residence using an individual well and on -site septic system. <br />Utilizing a set of assumptions on floor area, daily water usage, impervious surface, <br />and recharge rates for various types of ground cover and landscaping, the sub -basin <br />average lot size ranged from 1.42 to 2.09 acres with a countywide average of 1.82 <br />acres. Even though there is variability in minimum sustainable lot size in different <br />sub - basins, a prudent measure would suggest using a two -acre minimum lot size 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.