Browse
Search
APB agenda 101800
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Agricultural Preservation Board
>
Agendas
>
2000
>
APB agenda 101800
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2018 12:17:49 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 11:55:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/18/2000
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
05 <br />market, to see if any farmers in the county would be interested in <br />converting to vegetable production farm. <br />Recor suggested analyzing how many acres of each product would be <br />required to supply the needed amounts of broccoli, tomatoes, potatoes or <br />other locally grown vegetables. A coordinated effort of gathering enough <br />local farmers to produce the supply would need to follow. <br />Barber said that a local broker -type person coordinate what is produced <br />with what is needed would be critical to the success of any program. The <br />county also needs to determine which farmers would be willing to try a <br />new crop. <br />Kleese noted that there needs to be market data to stimulate farmers to <br />want to grow more vegetables, and encourage banks to lend money for <br />these trial crops. The Carolina Farm Stewardship Association believes <br />that there is more market for organic product than there are growers. A <br />survey of the North Carolina market during 1997 -1998, funded by the <br />Reynolds Foundation, collected data over a 15 -month period. The survey, <br />which recorded product volume, price fluctuation, and where products <br />came from, documented that over 85% of these products came from out of <br />state. The project suggested preparing as enterprise budgets as the next <br />step -- showing what the cost of production is compared to the end -cost <br />data. This information could be taken to the bank or used to make a <br />judgement call as to whether it is worth the risk to try new crop projects. <br />Developing market data is critical factor to stimulate agricultural risk <br />taking, without risking a substantial loss. <br />Mandell asked about the possibility of apprentices for the program. <br />Upcoming farmers could be linked with older farmers with active <br />farmland, equipment, and experience. <br />Morrow suggested that if a school /university issued a RFP for the <br />production of large quantities of vegetables over a certain time frame, the <br />farmer would have a guaranteed buyer for the product at a given price. <br />That type of arrangement might provide enough insurance for traditional <br />farmers to take a risk and switch from tobacco to vegetables. In addition, <br />if banks see profit margins, they are more likely to lend money. <br />Jacobs reported that their meetings with university /schools indicated that <br />institutions prefer to deal with a broker, who could consider locally <br />produced goods first. Community based childcare services was noted as <br />another high volume vegetable purchaser. Food shoppers are willing to <br />work with local producers to provide nutritious meals. A suggestion of <br />child care services might serve as a model — they are small enough that we <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.