Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
25 <br /> <br />development regulatory standards would be imposed on any independent lot developed as part <br />of any project. <br />Chair Dorosin asked if the roads will be smaller. <br />Michael Harvey said there would be an 18-feet wide roadway instead of 25-feet wide, <br />which is consistent with the County’s private road standard per section 7.8.5 of the UDO. He <br />said one of the benefits of this is the reduction in impervious surface area. <br />Chair Dorosin asked if there is a reason the developer did not come to the BOCC for <br />approval, prior making the modification. <br />Peter Bellantoni said they had submitted to DOT and the Army Corps, received the <br />permit for Army Corps, and the discussion with DOT seemed unresolvable. He said it was their <br />understanding that private roads were the alternate possibility. He said they should have come <br />to the BOCC sooner, but the crossing was needed either way. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Marcoplos, seconded by Commissioner Price for <br />the Board to approve the applicant’s request to modify the proposed roadways within the Triple <br />Crown subdivision from public to private, and approve the modified Resolution of Approval <br />contained in Attachment 4 with recommended conditions recommended by staff . <br /> <br />VOTE: Ayes, 4 (Commissioner Rich, Commissioner Burroughs, Commissioner Marcoplos, and <br />Commissioner Price); Nays, 3 (Chair Dorosin, Commissioner Jacobs, and Commissioner <br />McKee) <br /> <br />7. Reports <br />NONE <br /> <br />8. Consent Agenda <br /> <br />• Removal of Any Items from Consent Agenda <br /> <br />- Item d: discussed earlier in the meeting. <br />- Items e and f by Commissioner Price <br /> <br />• Approval of Remaining Consent Agenda <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to <br />approve the remaining items on the Consent Agenda. <br /> <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> <br />• Discussion and Approval of the Items Removed from the Consent Agenda <br /> <br />e. Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Amendment Outline <br />Form Modification – Home Park Acreage Increase and Additional Land Uses <br />The Board considered a modification to a previously approved Amendment Outline Form (AOF) <br />and re-approve process/schedule components for a proposed text amendment to the Orange <br />County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). <br /> <br />Commissioner Price asked if the ratio of mobile homes to the public parks/government <br />offices is known.