Browse
Search
Minutes 04-10-2018 CIP
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Minutes 04-10-2018 CIP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 2:53:44 PM
Creation date
5/8/2018 11:19:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/10/2018
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Agenda Item
5/1/18; 8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-10-2018 Budget Work Session CIP
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 04-10-2018 Budget Work Session
Agenda - 04-10-2018 Item 1 - Discussion of Manager’s Recommended FY 2018-23 Capital Investment Plan
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 04-10-2018 Budget Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> <br />Travis Myren asked if Commissioner McKee would want the price for doing the grading <br />work for the three facilities. <br />Commissioner McKee said he would like to price the detention center only. <br />Commissioner Burroughs seconded Commissioner McKee’s comments, and said she <br />questions if these projects need to be completed so soon. She said she would continue to <br />caution the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) to consider what can be delayed, and <br />while building in the future may be more expensive, that is true of every project being <br />considered in all areas of the County. <br />Commissioner Rich asked if the proposed detention center would the have room for <br />expansion in the future, beyond the capacity of 144 detainees. <br />Travis Myren said yes, up to 250. <br />Commissioner Rich asked if this would entail additional construction down the road, or <br />if the building will be constructed now, and used at a later date. <br />Jeff Thompson said the infrastructure would be prepared to expand to 250, include the <br />subgrade work, but there would be no actual walls. <br />Bonnie Hammersley said it will be only a 144 bed facility, but with the capability of <br />expanding to 250 beds; for example the kitchen will have the ability to serve a population of <br />250, but there will be no additional empty cells. <br />Commissioner Rich said it is being built to capacity for the services, but not having the <br />full capacity beds at this time. She said at one point there was discussion of having a place at <br />the facility where one can be brought who is not necessarily getting arrested, but may be in <br />need of mental health services. She asked if this is still part of the discussion. <br />Travis Myren said it is not in the current facility price. <br />Sheriff Blackwood said there was a trip to the WakeBrook facility in Wake County, <br />which is mental health facility that accepts people in custody as well as those who come in off <br />the street. He said Orange County had the thought of doing that with 6-8 rooms at this <br />detention site that were off by themselves and could provide wrap around services to help <br />people on the street get to a secure and safe alternative. He said this discussion came about <br />as possibly being a great opportunity to serve an underserved population that does not belong <br />in the jail or in the emergency room. <br />Chair Dorosin asked if these rooms are in this design now. <br />Sheriff Blackwood said this was just a vision, and a what if. He said the number of <br />beds is all over the place and changes frequently. He said he does not know if 250 beds will <br />be needed, but the 126 beds at the current jail are insufficient. <br />Commissioner Price said there have been other examples around the country where <br />the WakeBrook model does work, and there are chairs instead of beds in unsecure locations. <br />Commissioner Price referred to page 32 in CIP Notebook, and said the numbers are <br />different than those on the slide. She said the first sentence on page 32 says $1,250,000 were <br />spent in prior years and included in the architectural/engineering costs. She asked if these <br />funds have already been expended. <br />Jeff Thompson said some has been expended, but most has not. <br />Commissioner Price asked if the $12 million includes any more architectural funds. <br />Jeff Thompson said no. <br />Commissioner Price asked if it numbers in today’s handout could be clarified. <br />Travis Myren referred to page 32, and said those numbers were an estimate for a <br />stand-alone detention facility. He said the first row, of the table on page 13 of the PowerPoint <br />presentation, removes the site work and acquisition costs out of the $19.9 million five-year <br />total. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he is confused by this conversation, because the Justice <br />Advisory Council has been talking about the supplemental services being in the building for a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.