Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
25 <br /> <br />standard, but is a zoning development standard. He said if there were ten-acre lots, each 1 <br />property owner that had a water feature on their property, would have to preserve the buffer as 2 <br />articulated in section 6.13 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). He said all applicable 3 <br />development regulatory standards would be imposed on any independent lot developed as part 4 <br />of any project. 5 <br />Chair Dorosin asked if the roads will be smaller. 6 <br />Michael Harvey said there would be an 18-feet wide roadway instead of 25-feet wide, 7 <br />which is consistent with the County’s private road standard per section 7.8.5 of the UDO. He 8 <br />said one of the benefits of this is the reduction in impervious surface area. 9 <br />Chair Dorosin asked if there is a reason the developer did not come to the BOCC for 10 <br />approval, prior making the modification. 11 <br />Peter Bellantoni said they had submitted to DOT and the Army Corps, received the 12 <br />permit for Army Corps, and the discussion with DOT seemed unresolvable. He said it was their 13 <br />understanding that private roads were the alternate possibility. He said they should have come 14 <br />to the BOCC sooner, but the crossing was needed either way. 15 <br /> 16 <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Marcoplos, seconded by Commissioner Price for 17 <br />the Board to approve the applicant’s request to modify the proposed roadways within the Triple 18 <br />Crown subdivision from public to private, and approve the modified Resolution of Approval 19 <br />contained in Attachment 4 with recommended conditions recommended by staff . 20 <br /> 21 <br />VOTE: Ayes, 4 (Commissioner Rich, Commissioner Burroughs, Commissioner Marcoplos, and 22 <br />Commissioner Price); Nays, 3 (Chair Dorosin, Commissioner Jacobs, and Commissioner 23 <br />McKee) 24 <br /> 25 <br />7. Reports 26 <br />NONE 27 <br /> 28 <br />8. Consent Agenda 29 <br /> 30 <br />• Removal of Any Items from Consent Agenda 31 <br /> 32 <br />- Item d: discussed earlier in the meeting. 33 <br />- Items e and f by Commissioner Price 34 <br /> 35 <br />• Approval of Remaining Consent Agenda 36 <br /> 37 <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to 38 <br />approve the remaining items on the Consent Agenda. 39 <br /> 40 <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS 41 <br /> 42 <br />• Discussion and Approval of the Items Removed from the Consent Agenda 43 <br /> 44 <br />e. Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Amendment Outline 45 <br />Form Modification – Home Park Acreage Increase and Additional Land Uses 46 <br />The Board considered a modification to a previously approved Amendment Outline Form (AOF) 47 <br />and re-approve process/schedule components for a proposed text amendment to the Orange 48 <br />County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). 49 <br /> 50