Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 050218
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
OCPB agenda 050218
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2018 2:02:52 PM
Creation date
4/24/2018 2:53:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/2/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 050218
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM 4: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO)TEXT AMENDMENTS –HP-CZ(HOME PARK –CONDITIONAL 102 <br />ZONING)DISTRICT -To review government-initiated amendments to the text of the UDO that will clean up items that 103 <br />were inadvertently omitted from amendments that were adopted in 2017. 104 <br />105 <br />PRESENTER:Patrick Mallett, Planner II106 <br />107 <br />Patrick Mallett presented the item. He explainedthat the word “mobile” is being removed from the UDO because the 108 <br />legal term now is a manufactured home and the intent is to allow for flexibility such as for home park operators to use 109 <br />recreational vehicles temporarily. Also, there is a reference to existing mobile home parks and he will consult the 110 <br />county attorney’s office on that because there is a taxation difference for mobile home parks. 111 <br /> 112 <br /> 113 <br />AGENDA ITEM 5:UNIFIEDDEVELOPMENTORDINANCE(UDO)TEXTAMENDMENTS–ADDUSESTOHP-CZ114 <br />DISTRICT - To review government-initiated amendments to the text of the UDO that will add allowable potential uses 115 <br />in the HP-CZ District116 <br /> 117 <br />PRESENTER: Patrick Mallett, Planner II 118 <br /> 119 <br />Patrick Mallett said there is piece of property on which the county is considering creating a home park district. That 120 <br />property would also include some governmental and recreational uses. These amendments would increase the cap 121 <br />to 100 acres and allow for the governmental and recreational uses. 122 <br />123 <br />Kim Piracci said in Emerald Isle, North Carolina, there are parks that have both mobile homes and tiny homes. Is this 124 <br />the intent? 125 <br />126 <br />Patrick Mallett said legally speaking, there is no such thing as a tiny home. Tiny homes have to fall in a variety of 127 <br />categories. Most commonly, tiny homes are on wheels. They either have to be built to a stick-built standard, modular 128 <br />home standard, or manufactured home standard or recreational vehicle model. The greatest difficulty to overcome is 129 <br />that the framing dimensions do not meet any code. 130 <br />131 <br />Patrick Mallett said these amendments address home parks, manufactured homes or temporary residential units. 132 <br />The temporary residential units have to meet the building code after being in place for 180 days. Temporary 133 <br />residential units have a water and sewer hook-up like a recreational vehicle.134 <br />135 <br />Planning Director Craig Benedict said North Carolina is addressing standards for smaller homes. 136 <br /> 137 <br />AGENDA ITEM 6:UNIFIEDDEVELOPMENTORDINANCE(UDO)TEXTAMENDMENTS–SUBDIVISIONREVIEW138 <br />PROCESS - To review government-initiated amendments to the text of the UDO that will modify subdivision review 139 <br />processes, in accordance with Session Law 2017-10. 140 <br /> 141 <br />PRESENTER: Patrick Mallett, Planner II 142 <br /> 143 <br />Patrick Mallett said this amendment will mirror state legislation. This language created an expedited subdivision. If 144 <br />the property is five acres and the property owner is creating no more than three lots, than the subdivision would be 145 <br />expedited in that only a plat would be required. He thinks the intent for this regulation is for families to be able to 146 <br />subdivide some property for family members. 147 <br />148 <br />149 <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.