Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 040418
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2018
>
OCPB agenda 040418
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2018 2:02:37 PM
Creation date
4/24/2018 2:52:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/4/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 040418
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Development Ordinance Amendments of the UDO, the Planning Director has <br />initiated text amendments to the UDO to incorporatestandards governing the height, <br />number, and location of flagpoles as well as the size of flags. <br />The purpose of the amendment is to ensure uniformity with respect to the display of <br />flags and the allowable height of flagpoleswithin Orange County. <br /> <br />2.Analysis <br />As required under Section 2.8.5 of the UDO, the Planning Director is required to: <br />‘cause an analysis to be made of the application and, based upon that analysis, <br />prepare a recommendation for consideration by the Planning Board and the Board of <br />County Commissioners’. <br />There are currently no regulatory standardsgoverning the height of a flagpoleor size <br />of flagsflown/displayedwithin the county.Concerns have been expressed over the <br />lack of regulation(s) ensuring the display of a flag does not dominate local skylines. <br />Staff has been directed to establish regulations governing the overall allowable <br />height of a flagpoleas well as standards governing allowable flag area. <br />The proposed regulation does not attemptto establish content standards. Such <br />regulations are inconsistent with numerous court proceedings including the US <br />Supreme Court Case Reed versus Town of Gilbert.For more information on the <br />case and its potential impacts please refer to the <br />following: http://canons.sog.unc.edu/?p=8167. <br />Theproposed regulation is to ensure uniformity with respect to the size and number <br />of flags that can be displayed on property as well as a measurable standard onthe <br />height of any erected flagpole. <br />3.Comprehensive Plan Linkage (i.e. Principles, Goals and Objectives) <br />Land Use Goal 6: <br />A land use planning process that is transparent, fair, open, efficient, and responsive. <br />4.New Statutes and Rules <br />Not applicable <br />C. PROCESS <br />a.TIMEFRAME/MILESTONES/DEADLINES <br />a.BOCC Authorization to Proceed <br />March 20, 2018 <br />b.Public Hearing <br /> 13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.