Orange County NC Website
Approved 4/4/18 <br />public charge, the Chair will ask the offending member to leave the meeting until that individual 56 <br />regains personal control. Should decorum fail to be restored, the Chair will recess the meeting until57 <br />such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed.58 <br />59 <br />AGENDA ITEM 6:CHAIR COMMENTS60 <br />There were no comments.61 <br />62 <br />AGENDA ITEM 7:MAJOR SUBDIVISION –MORGAN RIDGE -To review an application involving a major subdivision 63 <br />located in Bingham Township on the Chatham/Orange county line. The only activity within Orange County is 64 <br />dedication of public right of way for a public road.65 <br />PRESENTER:Patrick Mallett,Planner II.66 <br />67 <br />Patrick Mallett presented the item, which involved 0.65 acres. He reviewed the vicinity map, plan overview, and site 68 <br />photographs. The subdivision includes 16 lots, all within Chatham County.The average lot size isclose to 3 acres. 69 <br />He reviewed there is an old barn on the property that will be dismantled. This item is scheduled to go before the 70 <br />Orange County Board of Commissioners next month and the Chatham County Board of Commissioners the following71 <br />month.72 <br />73 <br />Paul Guthrie said hegrew up near this property and has reviewed the topography.He wonderedwhether the74 <br />developers thought there would be any problem getting well water in that location. He wondered whether there is 75 <br />going to be a problem maintaining stream flow into Lake Jordan by the time the developersdraw down the wells. He 76 <br />acknowledged that his questions were outside the purview of this board for this development.77 <br />78 <br />Patrick Mallett noted Orange County does not have jurisdiction over those aspects of the project. As a general 79 <br />statement, he added that Chatham County has a similar process of approving subdivisions and similar permits. He 80 <br />noted WarrenMitchellis the site civil engineer and the developer. 81 <br />82 <br />Warren Mitchell, project engineer and one of the developers, introduced himself to the board and introduced Wesley 83 <br />Lloyd, sitting in the audience with him, asthe other developer on the project. Warren Mitchell said the streams have 84 <br />been evaluated by the Army Core ofEngineers. Regarding the wells, others nearby have not had a problem getting 85 <br />water from their wells.He did not anticipate a problem. 86 <br />87 <br />MOTION by Adam Beemanmoved to recommend that the Orange County Board of Commissioners approve the 88 <br />dedication of the public right of way and continuation of that public road, provided that Chatham County approves.89 <br />Seconded by Paul Guthrie.90 <br />VOTE:Unanimous91 <br />92 <br />AGENDA ITEM 8:MAJORSUBDIVISION–TRIPLECROWNFARMS-To review an application involving revisions to 93 <br />an approved major subdivision located in Chapel Hill Township. Revisions include a change in the road standards 94 <br />from public to private.95 <br />PRESENTER:Patrick Mallett, Planner II.96 <br />97 <br />Patrick Mallett reviewed that Triple Crown Estates is located to the north and is a separate development. He 98 <br />indicated the location of thisdevelopmenton the vicinity map, as well as the location of the planned Triple Crown 99 <br />Farms. Hereviewed that Triple Crown Farms is a major subdivisionthat wasapproved in 2014. He shared the 100 <br />preliminary plat and noted there are now 19 lots instead of 20. The developer ran into a problem with building to 101 <br />NCDOT standards. To comply with 401 and 404 permitting, the developer tried to minimize disturbance along 102 <br />streams by building a paved metal arc roadway that spans the creek. It will be 18 feet wide instead of the planned 20 103 <br />feet. It will not meet NCDOT standards, so the developer is proposing to make it a private road.The layout and open 104 <br />space of the subdivision has not changed. Patrick Mallett reviewed the plan overview and shared site photographs. 105 <br />He reviewed the staff recommendation to approve the roadway with conditions that the developersubmit and record 106 <br />a road maintenance agreement, a disclosure statement, and evidence that sufficient access to off-site water and fire 107 <br />suppression devices have been obtained.He notedthe project engineer has submitted draft copies of these 108 <br />requirements.109 <br />110