Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1009 have to go through a formal site plan review process in order to for staff to determine compliance with the <br />1010 applicable provisions of the UDO as well as the approved Special Use Permit. <br />1011 <br />1012 Chairwoman Cabe: And just to clarify on the top of page 82, just to make sure we have the proper <br />1013 reference here, the Attachment makes reference to Section 5.7.4 of the UDO as establishing submittal <br />1014 requirements and evaluation criteria. <br />1015 <br />1016 Michael Harvey: Yes man, the correct reference to the Camp /retreat center standards is Section 5.7.5 of <br />1017 the UDO versus Section 5.7.4. <br />1018 <br />1019 Chairwoman Cabe: Thank you for the clarification. <br />1020 <br />1021 Michael Harvey: As indicated on the top of page 86, no evidence was submitted to staff indicating the <br />1022 project does not comply with the UDO. If the motion to approve the permit is made, staff recommends the <br />1023 imposition of 12 conditions, some of which have been modified this evening. <br />1024 <br />1025 Chairwoman Cabe: Just for the record does the staff has an objection to the revised wording of Condition <br />1026 6, which I will read into the record? <br />1027 <br />1028 Michael Harvey: Staff has no objections to revised Condition 6 <br />1029 <br />1030 MOTION by to close the public hearing. Karen Barrows Seconded by Susan Halkiotis. <br />1031 <br />1032 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />1033 <br />1034 Chairwoman Cabe: Are there any comment(s) on staff's testimony, recommendations, or other matters <br />1035 before we begin voting on the recommended findings? <br />1036 <br />1037 No comment. <br />1038 <br />1039 MOTION made by Susan Halkiotis to adopt the staff recommended findings as contained within the <br />1040 amended Attachment 5, pages 79 -80, of the application package. Seconded by Randy Herman. <br />1041 <br />1042 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />1043 <br />1044 MOTION made by Susan Halkiotis to adopt the staff recommended findings as contained within the <br />1045 amended Attachment 5, page 81, of the application package relating to the applicant's compliance with the <br />1046 provisions of Section 5.3.2 (B) 1 through 3 inclusive. Seconded by Karen Barrows. <br />1047 <br />1048 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />1049 <br />1050 MOTION made by Randy Herman to approve the staff recommended findings as contained within the <br />1051 amended Attachment 5, pages 82 -83, of the application package relating to the applicant's compliance with <br />1052 the submittal and evaluation criteria detailed in Section 5.7.5 of the UDO for camp /retreat centers. <br />1053 Seconded by Susan Halkiotis. <br />1054 <br />1055 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />1056 <br />35 <br />