BOA agenda 041618 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property). Application narrative (Attachment 2) does indicate similar facilities, including the Barn of Vahalla north of the site, have not impacted adjacent property values. Applicant has indicated expert testimony will be offered at the public demonstrating compliance. Proposed Finding: As of the writing of this abstract, there is no competent /material evidence available suggesting the project will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property. The location and character of the Section 5.3.2 Application package as contained Yes use, if developed according to the (A) (2) (c) in Attachment 2 inclusive including, but plan submitted, (will I will not) be in not limited to: harmony with the area in which it is to be located and the use is in ❑ Narrative compliance with the plan for the ❑ Environmental Assessmei(EA) physical development of the County Application as embodied in these regulations or ❑ Site Plan in the Comprehensive Plan, or Site Assessment (Attachment 1) Staff portion thereof, adopted by the Board review comments (Attachment of County Commissioners. 4) Proposed Finding: Based on the above findings, Applicant's Narrative, and Staff's report, the location and nature of the use, if developed according to the plan submitted, will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and the use is in compliance with the plan for the physical development of the County, as embodied in these regulations and in the Comprehensive Plan. 1004 1005 Michael Harvey: Staff has determined the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the various 1006 standards detailed in Section 5.3.2 (A) of the UDO and that there is a lack of competent, material, evidence 1007 in the record justifying a negative finding. Staff has recommended the Board find in the affirmative. Staff 1008 will remind you that, if approved, the special use permit authorizes the land use only. The applicant will 34