Orange County NC Website
Literature Review 2 <br />FREQUENCY OF UNINTENDED PREGNANCIES <br />The rate of unintended pregnancy can serve as an indicator of a society’s level of reproductive <br />health. The ability to control when one has a child reflects women’s autonomy, and leads to an <br />increased likelihood of positive child health outcomes (Finer & Zolna, 2016). Children <br />conceived unintentionally are less likely to receive adequate prenatal care, and face higher <br />likelihoods of low birth weight, premature birth, and exposure to toxins while in the womb (Kost <br />& Lindburg, 2015). <br /> <br />In 2011, 6.1 million pregnancies occurred in the United States. 45 percent of those pregnancies, <br />or 2.8 million, were unintended (Finer & Zolna, 2016). North Carolina’s rate is even higher, at <br />an estimated 54% in 2010 (Kost, 2015). While 2011 is the first substantial decline in the national <br />unintended pregnancy rate since 1981, the United States still has a rate significantly higher than <br />nations of similar levels of development. For example, Britain’s unintended pregnancy rate is <br />approximately 16 percent (Wellings, 2013). Further, within the United States’ overall high rate <br />of unintended pregnancy, substantial disparities exist. Research has found that poverty is the <br />primary driving force behind these disparities. <br /> <br />THE DISPARITY <br />Lawrence B. Finer and Stanley K. Henshaw’s 2006 study “Disparities in Rates of Unintended <br />Pregnancies in the United States…” sought to identify subgroups of the population in most need <br />of policy reform aimed at improving reproductive health. By combining 2001 data on pregnancy <br />intention with population data, the researchers determined that rates of unintended pregnancy <br />were “substantially above average” for women who were 18-24 years of age, unmarried, low- <br />income, who had not completed high school, and those of minority racial backgrounds. Rates of <br />unintended pregnancy among low-income and less educated women had actually increased from <br />1994 to 2001, while other groups’ rates fell in the same time period (Finer & Henshaw, 2006). <br /> <br />While the Finer and Henshaw study utilized data that is now over 15 years old, it illustrates the <br />trend of how certain adversely affected subgroups of the population, such as low-income and <br />poorly educated women, experience the highest rates of unintended pregnancy. This trend is <br />documented before the Finer and Henshaw study, as well as after. In 2011, women earning less <br />than the federal poverty level experienced an unintended pregnancy rate over 5 times that of <br />those who earned double the federal poverty level (Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, <br />2016). <br /> <br />Frost and Lindberg’s research indicates that birth control use helps women to take better care of <br />their families, support themselves financially, seek or retain a job, and complete their education. <br />These positive outcomes then translate to children growing up in more stable situations and <br />women advancing their social and economic statuses, particularly in the realms of education, <br />labor force participation, and average earnings (Frost & Lindbert, 2013). Autonomy over family