Browse
Search
BOH agenda 113016
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
BOH agenda 113016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2018 12:16:06 PM
Creation date
4/24/2018 12:13:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/30/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case Studies 8 <br /> <br />Most adolescents are excluded from the policy: only patients over the age of 18 and emancipated <br />minors are eligible. The bill prohibits pharmacists from requiring appointments for the provision <br />or dispension of the drug. The bill also permits pharmacies to charge patients an administrative <br />fee, but if the patient has an insurance plan that covers oral contraceptives they can only be <br />charged their applicable copay. Therefore, while pharmacists can charge the annual <br />administrative fee, the fee cannot become the burden of insured patients. Further, pharmacies <br />must disclose the “total cost” of hormonal contraceptives provided to patients over the counter to <br />patients when requested. <br /> <br /> <br />COSTS <br />“In 2010, 56% of all pregnancies in Tennessee were unintended” (Kost, 2015). At this time, the <br />federal and state government spent $530.7 million on unintended pregnancies in Tennessee, <br />$130.7 million of which was paid for by the state (Sonfield and Kost, 2015). The legislature is <br />hopeful that the law will decrease the number of unintended pregnancies, and therefore Medicaid <br />costs. <br /> <br />CONCERNS <br />The biggest concern in Tennessee regarding over the counter birth control sales was whether oral <br />contraceptives are safe to use without a doctor's approval. However, supporters, which include <br />the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, argued there are more dangerous <br />medicines available over the counter. Other concerns include paying for over the counter <br />medications. However, if the oral contraceptives were prescribed by a pharmacist, they would be <br />covered by insurance just as they would be from a physician. Also, there was concern that <br />women may not go in to get annual or every other year screenings. However, a study out of the <br />University of Texas found that approximately 80% of women utilizing over the counter birth <br />control would still continue to receive preventive screenings (Hopkins, 2012). <br /> <br />There was also a concern that women may lie on their self-assessment screening, and that the <br />self-assessment may be the only thing pharmacists have to judge whether or not a woman is <br />safely able to be prescribed birth control. While it is true that people are not always truthful, the <br />bill’s sponsor responded that it “is not possible to mandate clairvoyance.” There was also a <br />concern that the bill gives too much discretion to the pharmacist and does not explicitly say that <br />pharmacists have the authority reject giving high risk women a prescription. Also, there was the <br />concern that the bill does not give immunity to pharmacists, so they may be at risk of litigation. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.