Orange County NC Website
ii. The inclusion of a disclosure statement on the Final Plat, which also has <br />to be recorded within the Orange County Registrar of Deeds Office, <br />indicating all roadways are privately maintained by local property <br />owners. <br />iii. Local covenants for the development that specifically indicate all <br />roadways are privately maintained. <br /> <br />As indicated by the County Attorney during the April 3, 2018 regular meeting, both <br />of these document(s) would appear as part of a title search on the property and <br />will have to be disclosed to individuals purchasing property within the <br />development. <br /> <br />As a reminder, Section 7.4.7 of the UDO requires Planning staff to hold a meeting <br />between the developer and local property owners when maintenance <br />responsibilities are about to be turned over to a local homeowners association. <br />The purpose of this meeting is to ensure all parties are aware of their <br />responsibilities to maintain the common elements of the development (i.e. open <br />space, roadways, etc.) prior to the transfer. <br /> <br />While staff is aware this does not address concerns over the future sale of <br />property to new owners, other mechanisms as detailed herein have been <br />recommended to address this specific concern. <br /> <br />h. Will this impact the previously issued Erosion Control/Stormwater Permit(s)? <br />STAFF COMMENT: The simple answer is there should not be any impact on the <br />Erosion Control/Stormwater Permit(s) previously reviewed/approved by Orange <br />County. If the developer alters the design/construction elements of the proposed <br />roadways, revisions to these previously approved plans will be required. <br /> <br />i. Will there be a cost savings associated with the conversion of the roadways from public to <br />private road standards? <br />STAFF COMMENT: In short, yes there will be a savings on expenditures by the <br />developer if the requested modification is approved. <br />At this time the developer has not divulged the extent of these potential savings. <br />Please note there is no legal requirement within County regulations to do so. <br /> <br />Analysis: As required under Section 2.15.3 (E) of the UDO, the Planning Director is required to <br />deliver a Planning Director’s report and Planning Board recommendation to the BOCC for <br />consideration. In analyzing this request, the Planning Director offers the following: <br />1. The Preliminary Plat application has been deemed complete in accordance with the <br />requirements of Section 2.2 and 2.15.2 of the UDO. <br />2. Staff has determined that the property is of sufficient size to continue to support the <br />proposed subdivision. <br />3. Staff has determined the conversion of the proposed roadways would comply with the <br />applicable provisions of the UDO with respect to the number of lots being served by a <br />proposed Class A roadway. <br /> <br />Further staff has recommended, and the applicant has agreed to, several conditions to <br />ensure property owners are informed all roadways and stream crossings are privately <br />maintained. <br />6