Orange County NC Website
17 <br /> <br />Richard Penci said he cannot answer that question, because he was not with the firm at 1 <br />that time. 2 <br />Commissioner McKee said this is a concern to him, and the level of construction is very 3 <br />far along, and the substructure is in, and the only thing lacking is to grade the subgrade and 4 <br />pave; however, it does not match the original requirements, which were to be to DOT specs, as 5 <br />he understands. He asked if there is a reason for this. 6 <br />Danny Jones, the developer, showed the BOCC a picture on a phone, and said he was 7 <br />told by his engineers that this is a geo-grid block wall, and it would be passed. He said he is 8 <br />unsure why DOT knocked it down, and DOT required poured concrete walls. He said he has 9 <br />documentation from personal engineers that say the bridge will be intact for 75 years. He said 10 <br />the process was documented, and appropriate testing conducted. He said he is not an 11 <br />engineer. He said the 401 permit had certain requirements from the Army Corps of Engineers, 12 <br />and he tried not to impact the creek. He said the roads are built to state standards, as is the 13 <br />creek crossing. He said the questions arise over the block wall, as opposed to poured concrete 14 <br />walls. He said tearing out the block wall will have more negative impact on the creek, than will 15 <br />help it in the long run. 16 <br />Commissioner Marcoplos asked if this change financially benefits the homeowners. 17 <br />Danny Jones said he developed the first phase of the neighborhood, and those roads 18 <br />would still be private if he had not begun the second phase of development, and pushed for 19 <br />those roads to become public. He said the first phase began 12 years ago, and he’s only 20 <br />begun to send this phase due to the economy improving. He said these changes would provide 21 <br />a savings to the homeowner. 22 <br />Commissioner McKee referred to preliminary plan approval information in the packet 23 <br />and item #7, where it states the average price of houses, including lots, is $1.2 million. He 24 <br />asked if this cost is per lot, or proposed 4 lots per year build out. 25 <br />Danny Jones said the $1.2 million is the average price of a home in this subdivision. 26 <br />Chair Dorosin asked if the developer put in this wall before getting approval, and if the 27 <br />BOCC does not approve it, will the developer have to tear it down and build it to DOT 28 <br />standards. 29 <br />Danny Jones said if the BOCC does not approve this, his option would be to go to an 30 <br />exempt subdivision with 10-acre lots. 31 <br />Chair Dorosin asked if this gets approved, how much does this save the developer on 32 <br />building the roads. 33 <br />Danny Jones said it would save him nothing on the roads, and he would have to tear out 34 <br />the wing walls and use poured concrete, which would do more harm. He said he would be 35 <br />better off changing to an exempt subdivision. 36 <br />Chair Dorosin asked if the number of houses would be less with the exempt subdivision 37 <br />scenario. 38 <br />Danny Jones said there would be 10 fewer homes that he could build. 39 <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said he is still confused about the bridge. He clarified that the 40 <br />developer has documented assessments of the bridge completed by engineers, and it has been 41 <br />deemed structurally sound. 42 <br />Danny Jones said there were people present around the clock as the construction was 43 <br />being completed, and everything is documented. 44 <br />Commissioner Marcoplos asked if all the homeowners could see these documents, and 45 <br />have them referenced in their agreements, if they so chose. 46 <br />Danny Jones said yes, and he is not sure why DOT turned it down. He said he has the 47 <br />engineering to back up the data. 48 <br />Chair Dorosin said if this passes, the developer will get some savings, and he asked the 49 <br />developer if he would contribute any of those savings to affordable housing. 50