Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-03-2018 6-a - Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application – Triple Crown Farms
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2018
>
Agenda - 04-03-2018 Regular Meeting
>
Agenda - 04-03-2018 6-a - Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat Application – Triple Crown Farms
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 3:52:28 PM
Creation date
3/29/2018 3:53:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/3/2018
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-03-2018 Regular Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2018\Agenda - 04-03-2018 Regular Meeting
Minutes 04-03-2018
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Patrick R. Mallett <br />From: Michael Harvey <br />Sent: Tuesday, January 3O,2O189:38AK4 <br />To: Danny]nnes <br />Cc: Peter Bellantoni; Chuck Edwards Contact; Craig Benedict; Patrick R. Mallett <br />Subject: RE: Triple Crown Farms, Orange County NC Final Plat Approval <br />I believe your summation is accurate. <br />|feet it necessary, however, to Summarize how we got here from the information I have available to me: <br />1. Pennoni submitted construction drawings to NC DOT for review to build the approved roadways, which per the County <br />approved subdivision application were tobe constructed bo public road standards. Said standards which are interpreted <br />and enforced by the local N[ DOT engineering division; <br />PennVni also submitted required permit mpp|icationhJto: Orange County Erosion Control, US Army Corps of <br />Engineering, and Current Planning for authorization to commence earth disturbing activities. From nny perspective all <br />approvals were given bythe County with the understanding road work would not commence until appropriate DOT <br />permits had been issued given the fact they were originally proposed, by the applicant as part of tile subdivision <br />submittal, tobe built tmthe applicable public road standard; <br />3. There are conflicting viewpoints from the various involved parties (i.e. Pennoni and DOT staff) on what happened <br />next. All that is clear to me is that roadwork improvements were initiated without required DOT approval, without <br />required DOT permits, and without required DOT inspections; <br />4, There are also, apparently based onwhat staff has heard from tile various parties, conflicting view points of what should <br />and should not be allowed by0CDOT with respect to these roadways; <br />5. According to Pennoni and the applicant, addressing the issues created by the commencement of roadway construction <br />absent DOT approval and permitting would create an extreme impact to local waterways. Further b has been suggested <br />incorporating DOT required modifications to the roads at this point would negatively impact the previously issued Army <br />Corps. Permit; <br />6. At this stage the applicant is seeking to amend the approved subdivision to have the roads privately maintained by local <br />property owners. <br />NC DOT has 'chosen' not to take over these roads as work was commenced without required permits, without required <br />inspections, and roadway improvements are apparently 'out of compliance' with the applicable standards as determined bvthe <br />local DOT engineer. Language indicating this was some form of 'conscious' choice is very misleading. <br />County Planning staff cannot help the fact there has been purported tension(s) and disagreement(s) between DOT staff and your <br />engineer. As I am sure you will respect we cannot serve as an arbiter in these matters. <br />We are happy to assist getting the request expedited to the best of our abilities to allow the project to move forward. Having <br />said that we are also interested in a fair representation of the facts, from both sides, ensuring a transparent process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.