Browse
Search
OUTBoard agenda 121912
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2012
>
OUTBoard agenda 121912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 2:00:23 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 1:55:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/19/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OUTBoard minutes 121912
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange Unified Transportation Board\Minutes\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Quantitative Project Scoring <br />After projects are submitted by local jurisdictions at the county level, the projects will be scored by TARPQ <br />staff based on the quantitative criteria described below. There are separate scoring methodologies for <br />highway projects and bicycle/pedestrian projects. <br />Highway <br />Each county will have submitted a list of u12 to 10 highway projects in ranked order. As an initial basis for <br />determining the quantitative score, each project will receive points based on its rank within the county - level <br />project lists as follows: <br /># 1 Priority in Count <br />100 points <br /># 2 Priority in County <br /># 6 Priority in County <br />50 points <br /># 2 Priority in County <br />90 points <br />20 points <br /># 7 Priority in County <br />40 points <br /># 3 Priority in County <br />80 points <br /># 8 Priority in County <br />30 points <br /># 4 Priority in County <br />70 points <br /># 9 Priority in County <br />20 points <br /># 5 Priority in County <br />60 points <br /># 10 Priority in County <br />10 points <br />In addition to this rank -based score, projects will also receive points based on a range of data- driven <br />criteria, including congestion, crash history, economic development, multimodal elements, jurisdictional <br />collaboration, and plan consistency. The specific criteria and point amounts are explained in the worksheet <br />on the next two pages. <br />Bicycle and Pedestrian <br />Each county will have submitted a list of up to 5 bicycle or pedestrian projects in ranked order. As an <br />initial basis for determining the quantitative score, each project will receive points based on its rank within <br />the county -level project lists as follows: <br /># 1 Priority in County <br />50 points <br /># 2 Priority in County <br />40 points <br /># 3 Priority in County <br />30 points <br /># 4 Priority in County <br />20 points <br /># 5 Priority in County <br />10 points <br />In addition to this rank -based score, projects will also receive points based on an range of data - driven <br />criteria, including safety, connectivity, plan consistency, and jurisdictional collaboration. The specific <br />criteria and point amounts are explained in the worksheet on the next two pages. <br />Project Scoring Worksheet <br />The following worksheet details the points associated with the quantitative criteria, and will be used to <br />score each project. The first page is for highway projects and the second page is for bicycle and <br />pedestrian projects. <br />Draft Project Prioritization Policy — December 6, 2012 <br />33 <br />Return to Agenda <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.