Orange County NC Website
D R A F T <br />Jeff Charles responded that it would require doing all of OldNC86 and not just the rural section. He questions the 152 <br />financial input of that versus just going to new NC 86 and going up that way. Jeff noted he could see that it would 153 <br />benefit pedestrians. 154 <br />155 <br />Paul Guthrie commented again on the problems of assessing projects without full information on connectivity with 156 <br />other jurisdictions. For example, referencing that onthe little segment of Jones Ferry Road which is marked up, he 157 <br />understands what it connects to because of what is down in Chatham County,but to someone in Orange County 158 <br />looking at this map,without reference to Chatham County’s map, may not have any idea why that piece is there. 159 <br />160 <br />Abigaile Pittman asked for a summary of the Board’s final comment on the Old NC 86 project. It was summarized 161 <br />that the investment in the wide shoulders should be dropped unless needed for vehicle safety, that the commuting 162 <br />bikeroute would be best on new NC 86, and that the only way that a bike route should be included along Old NC 86 163 <br />was if it was an off-road facility.164 <br />165 <br />Pedestrian Map Comments:166 <br />Sam Lasris commented that he would like to see better identification of the MPO boundary lines and road names on 167 <br />the map.He said that he kept getting confused on what was a boundary line and what was a proposed pedestrian 168 <br />trail. Multiple other members of the OUTBoard agreed, saying that the boundary lines should be labeled on all of the 169 <br />CTP maps.170 <br />171 <br />Motion by Alex Castro that the OUTBoard recommend the comments discussed in the presentation and the 172 <br />additional comments discussed here tonight. Seconded by Jeff Charles173 <br />Vote:Unanimous174 <br />175 <br />176 <br />AGENDA ITEM VI: STAFF UPDATES177 <br />a.Update on Orange CountyMaster Aging Plan 2012-2017 transportation strategies 178 <br />(Alex Castro)179 <br />b.Update on BOCC review of a second County comment letter to NCDOT Rail Division 180 <br />regarding the three proposed railroad private crossing closures in Orange County. 181 <br />Related documents: http://orangecountync.gov/planning/RRCrossingClosure.asp182 <br />c.Update on NCDOT Annual Statement for 2012 secondary road construction 183 <br />(Attachment 10).184 <br />d.Update on proposed Mebane and Gibsonville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans185 <br />e.2013 BG MPO TAC Commissioner Appointments from Orange County (Barry Jacobs 186 <br />and Earl McKee)187 <br />f.2013 DCHC MPO TAC Commissioner Appointments from Orange County (Alice 188 <br />Gordon and Bernadette Pelissier)189 <br />g.2013 TARPO RTAC Commissioner Appointments from Orange County (Renee Price 190 <br />and Bernadette Pelissier)191 <br />h.NCDOT new appointments to the Board of Transportation192 <br />i.TARPO updates from Matt Day 193 <br />j.Specifics on roundabout project from DCHC list provided at January 16th meeting (to 194 <br />answer questions raised by Board members) 195 <br />k.BOCC’s 2013 Boards and Commissions Work Session held on January 29, 2013 and 196 <br />was attended by Paul Guthrie, Jeff Charles, and Ted Triebel. 197 <br />OUTBoard Action: Receive updates198 <br />199 <br />Alex Castro updated the OUTBoard on the Master Aging Plan that pertains to transportation and navigation including 200 <br />2 handouts. He noted that Craig Benedict is a member of the steering committee, so the Planning Department is 201 <br />represented in those efforts and Commissioner Bernadette Pelissier is also on the steeringcommittee. In reviewing 202 <br />6 <br />ReturntoAgenda