Orange County NC Website
D R A F T <br />Matthew Day:I would add that the analysis done in terms of figuring out the needs is based on that future projected 56 <br />traffic volume so to a certain extent it doesn’t matter which base you use it matters what they are projected for in the 57 <br />2040 plan.58 <br />59 <br />Ted Triebel: This is a non-issue, right?60 <br />61 <br />Paul Guthrie: I think they made the adjustments in the base because when you make a projection you are starting 62 <br />somewhere. 63 <br />64 <br />Abigaile Pittman: Continued review of Attachment 2. One of the most controversial items in the plan was the project 65 <br />proposal regarding the NC 86 Expressway.66 <br />67 <br />Sam Lasris: Is it being left asanexpressway or being changed?68 <br />69 <br />Abigaile Pittman: It is being left as expressway. To change that would be a long process. DOT was looking at the 70 <br />whole strategic highway program. Matt,pleasetell uswhat you know.71 <br />72 <br />Matthew Day: They will be looking at the whole plan over the next two years. One of the ideas being floated is to 73 <br />remove the whole issue of pre-existing designations. If they do that then the whole issue will go away.74 <br />75 <br />Abigaile Pittman: Matt, you also previously made the comment that the traffic count on Highway 86 would never be 76 <br />great enough to call that an expressway.77 <br />78 <br />Paul Guthrie: The word “expressway” takes on a meaning beyond what was going to happen to the road and it 79 <br />scares people. These bring different feelings to people. I think working away from these labelsand talking more 80 <br />about what the facility is supposed to do would be very healthy.81 <br />82 <br />Abigaile Pittman: I wanted to show our progress todateon the CTP. We have a final draft of the CTP now and we 83 <br />are looking at adopting it. We will be reviewing two of the primary maps and related project proposals here tonight. If 84 <br />you will look at the Highway map on the back side, there areproblem statements (descriptions)fromthe report. 85 <br />86 <br />Matthew Day: Even though NCDOT doesn’tadopt the Problem Statements, if a project gets funded, this is where 87 <br />they start.88 <br />89 <br />Sam Lasris: I am wondering why the recycling center on Walnut Grove Church Road is not identified as an area of 90 <br />problems.91 <br />92 <br />Abigaile Pittman: We are here to collect those comments and in February we will pass them on the BOCC for them 93 <br />to consider.(Reviewed major projects).94 <br />95 <br />Abigaile Pittman: The Problem Statement (description) for North Efland Cedar Grove Road from Highland Farm 96 <br />Road to Carr Store Road was read.97 <br />98 <br />Sam Lasris: Just one tenth of a mile beyond Carr Store where this ends is the Post Office which everyone stops to 99 <br />turn off to. We should go to the Post Office with the widening.100 <br />101 <br />Ted Triebel: When I read ‘straightening of the roadway as needed’, who is the one to say what is needed?102 <br />103 <br />Sam Lasris: From Highland Farm Road to Carr is it all curves. The decision maker is NCDOT.104 <br />105 <br />Abigaile Pittman: Mebane Oaks Road from NC54 to Alamance County is currently a two-lane 22 foot cross section 106 <br />the CTP proposal is to provide a 24-foot cross section with wide shoulders and turn lanes where needed.107 <br />108 <br />Jeff Charles: What is the definition of a wide shoulder?109 <br />110 <br />4 <br />ReturntoAgenda