Browse
Search
OUTBoard agenda 011613
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2013
>
OUTBoard agenda 011613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 12:00:06 PM
Creation date
3/26/2018 11:59:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/16/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OUTBoard minutes 011613
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange Unified Transportation Board\Minutes\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Abigaile Pittman updated the members on the DCHC MPO MTIP projects. The draft TIPwas released for public <br />comment and a public hearing was held on November 14th by the DCHC Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC). <br />Every two years the DCHC MPO approves its TIP and NCDOT produces the state TIP (STIP). They coordinate the <br />projects on these companion TIPs which identify the transportation projects to receive funding over the next seven <br />years. The DCHC MPO adopted a regional priority list for the TIP to provide guidance to the state and the MPO and <br />the TIPs. The final TIP approval date was scheduled for June 2013. However, NCDOT announced a delay until the <br />spring of 2014. There is some additional informationwhich she will bring to the Boardin January. <br /> <br />Sam Lasris asked for the STIP list. <br /> <br />Abigaile Pittman gave the Board information regarding the quarterly NCDOT luncheon meeting.She advised them <br />that Attachment six is the notes from that meeting. <br /> <br />Craig Benedict advised that Orange County put together a plan for the economic development zones and worked <br />with DOT and identified intersections and access management roads that would be a continuation of a frontage road <br />in front of Collington Farms in Mebane. DOT is interested in seeing if Orange County can acquire right-of-way in that <br />area. <br /> <br />Craig Benedict noted that the future jail site in Hillsborough is south of 85 next to the DOT compound. <br /> <br />Abigaile Pittman discussedthe SPOT process and how it is used to review and rank projects for the TIP. <br /> <br />Matthew Day advised that it is basically the process by which the MPOs and RPOs submitprojects to DOT for <br />funding. <br /> <br />Sam Lasris asked if there was any discussion on bicycles on any of these updates. <br /> <br />Abigaile Pittman advised that NCDOT has announced that they are going to be increasing funding for their bicycle <br />and pedestrianprojects, significantly. <br /> <br />Abigaile Pittman advised that the local prioritization process that TARPO has adopted consists of three parts: <br />selection and ranking of projects at the countywide level, quantitative scoring of submitted projects and ranking of <br />scored projects, and assignment of SPOT points. <br /> <br />Paul Guthrie advised that he was less than impressed with the process. <br /> <br />Abigaile Pittman advised the members on the TARPO Division 7active projects status and noted that NCDOT did a <br />presentation at the last TARPO meeting and she referred tothe projects contained in the attachment. She advised <br />that for the January meeting she’d like to do anoverview of a list that just released byDCHC of some MPO projects. <br /> <br />Abigaile Pittman also advised that there is a new law that was passed by the General Assembly that requires MPOs <br />and RPOs to be treated as boards for the purposes of the state government ethics act and it is effective January 1, <br />2013. It is rather involved but the two main requirements of the act, in addition to conducting business in an ethical <br />manner, are the completion of an annual statement of economic interest and an annual ethics training course. It <br />applies not to the OUTBoard but to members and alternates of both the TCC and TAC committees. It is rather <br />controversial and it applies to not only to the member but to their household,including children. <br /> <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM VI: OUTBOARD INPUT FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS’ANNUAL PLANNING RETREAT: <br />Development of a list of concerns or emerging issues for the upcoming year that the <br />OUTBoard plans to address, or wishes to bring to the Commissioners’ attention. <br /> <br />ReturntoAgenda
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.