Orange County NC Website
D R A F T <br />168 <br />Chuck Edwards: It has been looked at. Recommendations have been made for internal improvements. We will be 169 <br />glad to revisit that.170 <br />171 <br />Jeff Charles: The ChapelHill Bike Ped Board received a letter from a gentlemanthat lived of Whitfield and he walks 172 <br />into Chapel Hill area and his concern was the new 86 and I40 Bridgefor pedestrians. We weren’t sure if it was in the 173 <br />Town or County.174 <br />175 <br />Chuck Edwards: We received the same information. Our traffic folks are looking at that. An obvious thing was the 176 <br />bridge was not designed for pedestrian walking. 177 <br />178 <br />Paul Guthrie:Are yougiving attention to the deteriorationof the old Kerr Scott Bridges? 179 <br />180 <br />Chuck Edwards: Absolutely. 181 <br />182 <br />Paul Guthrie: Some things tend to get overlooked. How are you approaching that issue?183 <br />184 <br />Chuck Edwards: One well-funded program we have is for the replacement of public bridges. 185 <br />186 <br />Paul Guthrie:I’ll give you one example, Old Greensboro Road and Phil’s Creek Bridge.There is more and more 187 <br />heavy truck traffic using that road, 18 wheelers and every time they go down that hill they knock another hole in the 188 <br />pavement. I assume you are doing regular inspection of these older bridges.189 <br />190 <br />Chuck Edwards: I wish I had brought my list, I will get back with Abigaile with more information.191 <br />192 <br />Jeff Charles: NCDOT worked on onebridge on Arthur Minnisnear Borland. There is another old bridge by that one 193 <br />that was actually in worse shape. Do you know if that one is prioritized?194 <br />195 <br />Chuck Edwards: Yes. They are handled by a design contractor.196 <br />197 <br />Jeff Charles: That will hit the cyclingcommunity hard.198 <br />199 <br />Chuck Edwards: We do reach out to others on these projects to provide public information.200 <br />201 <br />Abigaile Pittman: In theBuckhorn Economic Development District, there is old bridge on the south perimeter. We 202 <br />wouldn’t want it replaced as it is because the development in the areawill be industrial. When you look at these 203 <br />issues with related land use changes involved,do you consider upgrading the bridge to accommodate industrial 204 <br />traffic? 205 <br />206 <br />Chuck Edwards: Under this program, we are trying to get the best bang for the buck. At some point, if there is a 207 <br />need to change that, that particular bridge may not fit this program but another program.208 <br />209 <br />Paul Guthrie: If there are no other topics, we can move on.210 <br />211 <br />Chuck Edwards: Abigaile is giving out information about resurfacing roads.212 <br />213 <br />Abigaile Pittman: Reviewed information.Elizabeth Gregory will tell us about some of the problems encountered with 214 <br />emergency service vehicles on these 12-foot private road standards.215 <br />216 <br />Elizabeth Gregory: The main problem is the width because fire trucks are large and the ambulances also. People do 217 <br />not realize the county has no hydrants so the fire truck cannot hook up to a hydrant. They have to shuttle water 218 <br />which means trucks go to water sources and fill the truck that is on the scene of the fire. The main problem is the 219 <br />trucks have to turn around, so if they can’t pass each other. Our standard when weget into a subdivision is 20 feet 220 <br />but we try to work with DOTwith their standard of 18 feet. When you get down to 12 feetas in the Class B roadway,221 <br />they will need to send a smaller fire truck which holds less water. It is an access problem. Fire trucks are very 222 <br />expensive. If there are roads they cannot get down; they need to wait for another fire truck to get additional hose. 223 <br />6 <br />ReturntoAgenda