Orange County NC Website
<br /> 5 <br />County-designated bike routes, there may be ways to post routes so <br />motorists can take alternate routes. There are currently some best practices <br />for clubs and groups to consider when there are many cyclists riding together <br />or in pace lines on the roads. There are also safety reasons for cyclists to <br />“take the lane” which drivers may not understand. Sharing this information <br />and getting all to respect each other is key here. (Refer to the Appendix for <br />the detailed list.) <br /> <br />Vi. Orange County signage and messaging that focuses on cyclist and <br />motorist safety and respect can help educate the community. Again, using <br />the idea that promoting as the norm the behavior we want to see, the County <br />should be promoting positive messages and interactions. The Task Force <br />suggests that there be a motto developed that could be used for this <br />purpose. The BSTF suggests, “Ride Friendly, Drive Friendly”—with a graphic <br />showing both cyclist and motorist—be adopted as the slogan. <br /> <br />VII. Improvements to traffic signals to allow bicycles to trigger the traffic <br />signal will keep cyclists from getting stuck at intersections with loops that do <br />not pick up bicycles. As signals are installed, or intersections are upgraded, <br />bike-sensitive sensors should be specified. <br /> <br />VIII. Non-infrastructure recommendations of the adopted Safe Routes to <br />School (SRTS) plan within the County’s jurisdiction should be supported <br />as they come up for discussion. They are closely related to bicycle safety, <br />since making bicycling to school a safer and more appealing transportation <br />option encourages a healthy and active lifestyle from an early age. <br /> <br />IX. Creation of a Future Task Force to Study Infrastructure will provide the <br />County ways to explore the creation of new infrastructure (greenways, bike <br />lanes, etc.) and possible funding sources for it, since infrastructure was <br />beyond the scope of this Task Force. <br /> 20