Browse
Search
OUTBoard agenda 011817
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2017
>
OUTBoard agenda 011817
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 10:14:20 AM
Creation date
3/26/2018 10:07:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/18/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OUTBoard minutes 011917
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange Unified Transportation Board\Minutes\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />way dedication a statutory right that North Carolina towns have but not counties. Therefore, crafting this linkage 156 <br />between our access management plan(s) and the CTP/MTP documents is a way to ensure our right to require right-157 <br />of-way dedication at the time of development, as warranted. The revised CTP/MTP documents are being approved 158 <br />by the MPO’s and RPO’s. Jeff Charles was concerned that legislature was going to have a problem with this and 159 <br />inquired if this had been done before. Abigaile Pittman confirmed that the process had already been approved by 160 <br />NCDOT and as they are the ones that created it it’s also already approved in the Burlington/Graham MPO and is 161 <br />going forward next year for the DCHC MPO. And Max Bushell also confirmed they’ve done their due diligence and 162 <br />checked through various lawyers. 163 <br /> 164 <br />Abigaile Pittman continued presentation. 165 <br /> 166 <br />Abigaile Pittman was reviewing the list of items of concerns or emerging issues that they want the BOCC to be aware 167 <br />of, and wanted to know how the Board wanted to word their efforts on Safe Routes to School. Heidi Perry suggested 168 <br />titling it “Pursue implementation opportunities for Safe Routes to School”. 169 <br /> 170 <br />Alex Castro inquired about research for funding. Abigaile Pittman explained that it didn’t have to be federal, just any 171 <br />kinds of funding sources, which could even be County. 172 <br /> 173 <br />Jeff Charles inquired about the light rail and pointed out how it keeps being delayed year after year, and inquired 174 <br />about all the money that was going into it. Max Bushell explained that they’re 15% short of funding right now, which is 175 <br />about 200 million dollars. Jeff Charles asked what will happen to the money when the plan just doesn’t go through. 176 <br />Max Bushell answered that some of the money has been expended in the process of trying to get it built but not all of 177 <br />it. He went on to say that essentially there will be a new plan developed to achieve the same purpose and that it’s 178 <br />something they’re working on but the process has been set back a couple of years. 179 <br /> 180 <br />Abigaile Pittman reviewed item 4. 181 <br /> 182 <br />Jeff Charles questioned whether the bicycle related things should be kept on there due to the fact that state 183 <br />legislatures have taken away current and future funding for it. Heidi Perry suggested leaving it on there just in case 184 <br />there is funding that becomes available to bicycle related things. Heidi Perry also inquired about why electric bikes 185 <br />were separated. Abigaile Pittman explained that it was a carryover from last year. It was agreed to take them out. 186 <br /> 187 <br />Abigaile Pittman referred to the item “To work with NCDOT to promote funding of pedestrian and bicycle projects in 188 <br />rural areas to a greater degree”. Jeff Charles commented that they need to come up with some issues that they have 189 <br />some chance to be successful with. Alex Castro made an item addition suggestion regarding a commuter rail going 190 <br />from Garner to West Durham. He proposed that they find a way to make an extension of the currently planned 191 <br />commuter rail from West Durham to the Hillsborough Amtrak state. He added that Hillsborough’s population if going 192 <br />to double with everything planned and there could be a lot of people very interested in having that service. It was 193 <br />agreed to call it “Explore expansion of commuter rail”. 194 <br /> 195 <br />Jeff Charles recommended point 4 be modified regarding connectivity between Carrboro, Chapel Hill, and Bicycle 196 <br />Pedestrian Plans. 197 <br /> 198 <br />MOTION by Art Menius to approve the Work Plan for 2017 with the discussed revisions, and with item 4 being 199 <br />modified to address connectivity and infrastructural changes. Seconded by Alex Castro. 200 <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS 201 <br /> 202 <br />6.B. NEXT OUTBOARD MEETING DATE - (ABIGAILE PITTMAN) 203 <br /> 204 <br />Abigaile Pittman suggested that the Board not meet in December due to the holidays and the lack of agenda items 205 <br />for the meeting. The items they have for the next meeting would not be ready until January. 206 <br /> 207 <br /> 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.