Browse
Search
BOH agenda 042416
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Agendas
>
2016
>
BOH agenda 042416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2018 2:13:11 PM
Creation date
3/22/2018 2:12:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Document Relationships
BOH minutes 042716
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Board of Health\Minutes\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Health rankings not perfect, but have value <br />First Posted: 7:43 am - March 30th, 2016 <br />You have to give the the University of Wisconsin and the Robert J. Wood Foundation a healthy round of <br />applause for the ambitiousness of their undertaking, even if some critics doubt the relevance of their <br />findings. <br />We refer to the annual County Health Rankings pieced together each year by the university and the <br />foundation that attempt to rank by health more than 3,000 counties across the United States within <br />their own state. A variety of metrics are used for the report, which was released recently and — <br />disappointingly but unsurprisingly — determined that Robeson County was the unhealthiest of all of <br />North Carolina’s 100 counties. <br />Our own test, which is done with the eye, gives us confidence that the report, if not a bulls’eye, is pretty <br />darn accurate with regard to this county. <br />North Carolina’s health directors, including our own, Bill Smith, aren’t convinced of the report’s <br />worthiness. <br />Colleen Bridger, president of the association and Orange County’s health director, sent a letter to the <br />co-director of the annual County Health Rankings that read in part: “… While we appreciate your <br />intention to bring attention to the social determinants of health and the role they play in the <br />community’s health, we believe the ranking of counties must stop. The methodology is seriously <br />flawed.” <br />Smith also protested, but his letter was to this newspaper. He pointed out that it would be unlikely for <br />five counties to pass Robeson, which was 95th last year in the state, in a single year, tooted his <br />department’s own horn and added perspective. <br />He wrote: “The Healthy Robeson Task Force has been addressing issues such as infant mortality, <br />substance use, obesity, exercise, smoking, nutrition, etc. for years and the Community Health <br />Assessment has identified these areas as well. Let’s face it, whether we are 100 or 95 or 90, it is still a <br />largely unhealthy population in Robeson County. But even those ranked at the top in this state must <br />temper their enthusiasm with the knowledge that North Carolina is the 34th healthiest state, so there is <br />a lot of room to grow.” <br />Bridger, Smith and other health directors question the validity of the report largely because of how <br />information is collected, and work-arounds when there is no information.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.