Orange County NC Website
<br />UNC qualms about handling of February water crisis surface <br />3-30-17 <br /> <br />Turns out that UNC-Chapel Hill officials have some doubts after all about the handling of <br />February’s water crisis in Chapel Hill and Carrboro. <br />As voiced recently to university trustees by Brad Ives, associate vice chancellor for campus <br />enterprises, they concern what he termed the “rather drastic steps” at the height of the crisis to <br />order people not to drink or use water from the Orange Water and Sewer Authority’s piping <br />network. Ives told the trustees’ finance committee that campus officials think that in a similar <br />situation, it’s “going to be more important to have some senior-level staff” at Orange County’s <br />emergency operations center. <br />They also believe they “could’ve worked more closely with state environmental officials” who <br />they suspect influenced the decision in February to issue the twin alerts. Combined, the Feb. 3 <br />alerts shut down the towns’ restaurants, and prompted UNC to issue a rare advisory of its own <br />urging students to leave campus for the weekend. Officials believe 50 percent to 60 percent of <br />the students who reside on campus actually left. <br />The crisis had its roots in events the day before, when errors at OWASA’s Jones Ferry Road <br />water treatment plant triggered an “overfeed” of flouride into the plant’s water stockpile that <br />rendered it useless and took the plant offline. <br />Matters escalated the morning of Feb. 3 when a water-main break in northeast Chapel Hill <br />dumped a lot of the utility’s remaining, in-network water supply. Repairs proceeded quickly, and <br />officials were able to lift the don’t-use/don’t-drink orders mid-afternoon on Feb. 4. Ives, who in <br />the immediate aftermath of the crisis called OWASA “a trusted partner of the campus,” told <br />trustees it’s obvious an emergency existed. <br />OWASA’s water stockpile on Feb. 3 dropped below the 2 million gallons officials consider the <br />bare minimum needed. But in a later interview, he said campus officials now believe the <br />decision to call the alerts resulted from “a state determination by” the N.C. Department of <br />Environmental Quality. <br />“Had we had more information at the time it was happening, I think we could have stepped in <br />and talked to” the department, Ives said. “But we didn’t know exactly what was going on at the <br />time as to who was making the determination. We assumed it was a local determination.” <br />UNC’s environmental safety director, Mary Beth Koza, in an interview added that “procedures <br />were followed” in that local officials consulted state regulators and heard back from them that <br />“we should have a do-not-use.” <br />Both she and Ives noted that given the situation, the menu of potential responses changes and <br />often involve less drastic measures. Koza cited the example of an early-March boil-water <br />advisory in northeast Chatham County, in response to a water leak there and resulting pressure <br />drop.